Журналов:     Статей:        

Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2017; : 16-22

Языковые формы тоталитарной и антитоталитарной коммуникации в романе В. Гроссмана «Жизнь и судьба»

Бонола А. П.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/420/2

Аннотация

Автор анализирует, как разные коммуникативные подходы представлены в романе «Жизнь и судьба» Василия Гроссмана. Целью статьи является исследование не столько стиля, сколько типов коммуникативных процессов, выделяемых на основе разграничения манипулятивной и неманипулятивной коммуникаций. Таким образом, исследование проводится в методологических рамках не литературоведения, а лингвистики. Автор выделяет связи между лингвистической формой вопроса и темой свободы в творчестве Василия Гроссмана.
Список литературы

1. Rigotti E., Cigada S. La comunicazione verbale. Milano : Apogeo, 2006. 333 p.

2. Glowinski M. Nowomowa po polsku. Warszawa : Wyd. PEN, 1991. 146 p.

3. Klemperer V. LTI. Notizbuch eines Philologen. Leipzig : Reclam Verlag, 1975. 355 p.

4. Купина Н.А. Тоталитарный язык. Словарь и речевые реакции. Екатеринбург ; Пермь : Изд-во Урал. ун-та; ЗУУНЦ, 1995. 144 с.

5. Young J.W. Totalitarian Language: Orwell's Newspeak and its Nazi and Communist Antecedents. Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia, 1991. 320 р.

6. Сарнов В. Наш советский новояз. Маленькая энциклопедия реального социализма. М. : Материк, 2002. 600 с.

7. Weiss D. Was ist neu am "Newspeak"? Reflexionen zur Sprache der Politik der Sowjetunion // Slavistische Linguistik 1985 / R. Rathmayr. MUnchen : Otto Sagner Verlag, 1986. S. 247-325.

8. Bonola A. Discorso totalitario e dissenso linguistico in Vita e destino di Vasilij Grossman // Il romanzo della liberta. Vasilij Grossman tra i classici del XX secolo / G. Maddalena, P. Tosco. Rubbettino : Soveria Mannelli, 2007. P. 89-129.

9. Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1962. 179 p.

10. Besanjon А. Court traite de sovietologie a l'usage des autorites civiles, militaires et religieuses. Paris : Hachette, 1976. 125 p.

11. Arendt H. Le origini del totalitarismo. Milano : Edizioni di Comunita, 1989. 710 p.

12. Thom F. Newspeak. The Language of Soviet Communism. London ; Lexington : The Claridge Press, 1989. 218 p.

13. Seriot P. Analyse du discours politique sovietique. Paris : Institut d'Etudes slaves, 1985. 362 p.

14. Купина Н.А. Языковое сопротивление в контексте тоталитарной культуры. Екатеринбург : Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 1999. 176 с.

15. Вежбицка A. Антитоталитарный язык в Польше: механизмы сaмообороны // Вопросы языкознания. 1993. № 4/4. C. 37-53.

16. Bonola A. Forza chiara e libera della parola. Forme linguistiche in Vita e Destino // L'umano nell'uomo. Vasilij Grossman fra ideologie e doman-de eterne / P. Tosco. Soveria Mannelli : Rubbettino, 2011. P. 301-331.

17. Gobber G. Pragmatica delle frasi interrogative. Con applicazioni al. tedesco, al. polacco e al. russo. Milano : ISU-Universita Cattolica, 1999. 316 p.

18. Paducheva E.V. Question-answer correspondence Question-answer correspondence // Language and discrourse: test and protest. A Festschrift for Petr Sgall / l. Mey. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 1986. P. 373-382.

19. Gobber G. Una nota sul contenuto proposizionale delle domande // Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria. 2011. XIX/1. Р. 7-32.

20. Rathmayr R. Die russischen Partikeln als Pragmalexeme. MUnchen : Otto Sagner, 1985. 353 p.

21. Bonola A. Le particelle come manifestazioni del connettivo nella lingua russa (con esempi da Il giocatore - Igrok - di F.M. Dostoevskij) // Syndesmoi. Connettivi nella realta del testo / G. Gobber, S. Cigada. Milano : Vita e Pensiero, 2006. P. 199-220.

Tomsk State University Journal. 2017; : 16-22

Linguistic forms of totalitarian and antitotalitarian communication in Life and Fate by Vasily Grossman

Bonola A. P.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/420/2

Abstract

The author focuses on the linguistic forms of a confrontation between heroes of the novel Life and Fate by V. Grossman and the so-called "Newspeak" of the Soviet Era. The main idea is that it is not only the author's own speech but also the speech of his characters that conveys the invincibility of the human desire for freedom. The study describes the different communicative approaches represented in Grossman's novel. The author does not provide a stylistic analysis, but a linguistic one, trying to distinguish between manipulative and non-manipulative communication. So, the methodological approach of this study is a linguistic one, and its first presents the author's arguments, explaining the importance of using linguistic analysis for Life and Fate. The study begins with a short analysis of the main characteristics of totalitarian communication (perlocutionary effect of the word, changes in word's reference, reduction of polysemy, logocracy and label-words, censorship, denunciation and self-denunciation) and then shows two types of anti-totalitarian speech represented in the novel as well. The first one is a reactive linguistic resistance, expressed by everyday, non-ideological and colloquial conversation, on the one hand, and a more or less evident struggle against ideological euphemisms, on the other hand. The second type of anti-totalitarian speech is the so called language of life and freedom (in Grossman's thought these are two sides of one reality). Linguistic forms of free live communication are the following: 1) a word as a linguistic act of denial, acquiring a huge affirmative force in these situations; 2) free and intellectual dialogue; 3) the author's comments; 4) questions, in which the author is primarily focusing on do-issues of a surprised statement and problem questions that do not suppose any obvious answer. The article analyzes the four forms, and numerous examples show that in the novel they express a positive idea that the free human nature does not change even in a totalitarian society. The linguistic analysis points out the relationship between the linguistic form of questions and the theme of freedom in Grossman's novel.
References

1. Rigotti E., Cigada S. La comunicazione verbale. Milano : Apogeo, 2006. 333 p.

2. Glowinski M. Nowomowa po polsku. Warszawa : Wyd. PEN, 1991. 146 p.

3. Klemperer V. LTI. Notizbuch eines Philologen. Leipzig : Reclam Verlag, 1975. 355 p.

4. Kupina N.A. Totalitarnyi yazyk. Slovar' i rechevye reaktsii. Ekaterinburg ; Perm' : Izd-vo Ural. un-ta; ZUUNTs, 1995. 144 s.

5. Young J.W. Totalitarian Language: Orwell's Newspeak and its Nazi and Communist Antecedents. Charlottesville : University Press of Virginia, 1991. 320 r.

6. Sarnov V. Nash sovetskii novoyaz. Malen'kaya entsiklopediya real'nogo sotsializma. M. : Materik, 2002. 600 s.

7. Weiss D. Was ist neu am "Newspeak"? Reflexionen zur Sprache der Politik der Sowjetunion // Slavistische Linguistik 1985 / R. Rathmayr. MUnchen : Otto Sagner Verlag, 1986. S. 247-325.

8. Bonola A. Discorso totalitario e dissenso linguistico in Vita e destino di Vasilij Grossman // Il romanzo della liberta. Vasilij Grossman tra i classici del XX secolo / G. Maddalena, P. Tosco. Rubbettino : Soveria Mannelli, 2007. P. 89-129.

9. Austin J. How to do things with words. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1962. 179 p.

10. Besanjon A. Court traite de sovietologie a l'usage des autorites civiles, militaires et religieuses. Paris : Hachette, 1976. 125 p.

11. Arendt H. Le origini del totalitarismo. Milano : Edizioni di Comunita, 1989. 710 p.

12. Thom F. Newspeak. The Language of Soviet Communism. London ; Lexington : The Claridge Press, 1989. 218 p.

13. Seriot P. Analyse du discours politique sovietique. Paris : Institut d'Etudes slaves, 1985. 362 p.

14. Kupina N.A. Yazykovoe soprotivlenie v kontekste totalitarnoi kul'tury. Ekaterinburg : Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999. 176 s.

15. Vezhbitska A. Antitotalitarnyi yazyk v Pol'she: mekhanizmy samooborony // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1993. № 4/4. C. 37-53.

16. Bonola A. Forza chiara e libera della parola. Forme linguistiche in Vita e Destino // L'umano nell'uomo. Vasilij Grossman fra ideologie e doman-de eterne / P. Tosco. Soveria Mannelli : Rubbettino, 2011. P. 301-331.

17. Gobber G. Pragmatica delle frasi interrogative. Con applicazioni al. tedesco, al. polacco e al. russo. Milano : ISU-Universita Cattolica, 1999. 316 p.

18. Paducheva E.V. Question-answer correspondence Question-answer correspondence // Language and discrourse: test and protest. A Festschrift for Petr Sgall / l. Mey. Amsterdam : Benjamins, 1986. P. 373-382.

19. Gobber G. Una nota sul contenuto proposizionale delle domande // Analisi Linguistica e Letteraria. 2011. XIX/1. R. 7-32.

20. Rathmayr R. Die russischen Partikeln als Pragmalexeme. MUnchen : Otto Sagner, 1985. 353 p.

21. Bonola A. Le particelle come manifestazioni del connettivo nella lingua russa (con esempi da Il giocatore - Igrok - di F.M. Dostoevskij) // Syndesmoi. Connettivi nella realta del testo / G. Gobber, S. Cigada. Milano : Vita e Pensiero, 2006. P. 199-220.