Журналов:     Статей:        

Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2016; : 177-181

Этические основы международного экологического права

Гладун Е. Ф., Захарова О. В.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/413/27

Аннотация

Актуальность статьи обусловлена остротой глобального экологического кризиса и поисками способов его преодоления. Проанализированы ключевые тенденции развития международного экологического права. Продемонстрированы необходимость нормативно-правового регулирования отношений природы и общества, связь между социально-историческим развитием и этическими оценками природы. История развития международного права в области охраны окружающей среды рассмотрена как попытка решить проблемы социального и этического характера. Произведена попытка определить этические основания выделенных тенденций развития международного экологического права.
Список литературы

1. Вернадский В.И. Философские мысли натуралиста. М. : Наука, 1988. 522 с.

2. Реймерс Н. Ф. Экология (теории, законы, правила принципы и гипотезы) М. : Журнал «Россия Молодая», 1994. 367 с.

3. Экологическое право / под ред. С. А. Боголюбова. М. : Юрайт, 2011. 482 с.

4. Howarth W. The Progression towards Ecological Quality Standards // Journal of Environmental Law. 2009. Vol. 18 (1). Р. 3-35.

5. Rolston H. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988. 391 p.

6. Sepanmaa Y. The Beauty of Environment: A General Model for Environmental Aesthetics. Second Edition. Denton : Environmental Ethics Books, 1993. 191 p.

7. Schweitzer A. Civilization and Ethics. London : Unwin Books, 1967. 253 p.

8. Гоббс Т. Левиафан. М. : Мысль, 2001. 408 с.

9. Стокгольм 1972. Доклад конференции Организации Объединенных Наций по проблемам окружающей человека среды // Организации Объединенных Наций. Программа Охраны Окружающей Среды. URL: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp? DocumentID=97 (дата обращения: 14.06.2016).

10. Рио-де-Жанейрская декларация по окружающей среде и развитию // Декларации. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/ decl_conv/declarations/riodecl (дата обращения: 14.06.2016).

11. Хмелевская С. А., Яблокова Н.И. Система форм постижения бытия в контексте современной культуры // Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Сер. Философские науки. 2013. № 2. С. 74-78.

12. Экологический энциклопедический словарь. М. : Ноосфера, 2002. 930 с.

13. De Lucia V. Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law // Journal of Environmental Law. 2010. Vol. 27, is. 1. P. 91-117.

14. Международное экологическое право // Глобалистика: Международный энциклопедический словарь. Москва ; Санкт-Петербург ; Нью-Йорк : ЕЛИМА ; Питер, 2006. 1160 с.

15. Анисимов В.П. Проблемы современного международного экологического права и способы их решения // Вестник РГГУ. 2010. № 4. С. 114-123.

16. Чичварин В.А. Конвенция о ловле устриц и рыболовстве у берегов Великобритании и Франции. Подписана в Париже 02.08.1839 г. // Международные соглашения по охране природы : сб. док. М. : Юрид. лит., 1966. 420 с.

17. Кобылянский В. А. Философия экологии. М. : ФАИР-ПРЕСС, 2003. 192 с.

18. Definition of Biosafety // WTO Law. Science. GMOs. URL: http://www.ecolomics-international.org/headg_biosafety.htm (дата обращения: 10.03.2016).

Tomsk State University Journal. 2016; : 177-181

Ethical foundations of international environmental law

Gladun E. F., Zakharova O. V.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/413/27

Abstract

The significance of the paper is explained by the growing environmental crisis and the urgent need to overcome it. One of the possible ways to improve the environmental situation is to balance the relationship between society and nature efficiently. For a long time the relationship was regulated by ethical, religious norms and economic constraints. Nowadays the society needs proper legal mechanisms. The paper analyzes the necessity of legally binding rules regulating the relationship between society and nature; proves that legal regulations can beneficially supplement ethical rules and sometimes initiate their development. At the same time, the linkage and interdependence of ethics and law are emphasized. The arguments for this include: the devastating nature of economic activities in the late twentieth century forced to initiate new methods and limits of these activities; the expanding knowledge about nature has made it possible to create rational norms and regulations; the failure to keep traditional moral values in the post-classical era is leading to the need of building new ways of regulation; the global social processes require the development of supranational norms. International environmental law focuses on regulating the relationship of society and nature according to two ethical positions. One is anthropocentrism with the whole set of related attributes: hierarchy, humanism, resource use, etc., which were establishing for centuries. The other is ecocentrism with its attempt to focus on the interests of natural communities which has been emerging for more than a hundred years. The paper examines trends in the development of modern environmental law: extension of the scope of legal regulation by recognizing the intrinsic value of animate and inanimate natural objects; protection of ecosystems consisting of natural objects and conditions ensuring their interaction, the cyclical and dynamic balance; increase of the number of stakeholders whose interests and values are taken into consideration in the legislation; uncertainty of some concepts of international environmental law leaving the opportunity to understand the context. It is concluded that the trends in the development of environmental law are certain attempts to solve the problems and contradictions of social and ethical issues. Moreover, international environmental law has the potential to be at the forefront of social development, affirming the value of ecocentrism and creating a new paradigm of society-nature relationship. The paper is based on research in the field of environmental ethics, ideas of Russian philosophers, materials of international environmental conferences and regulatory acts. In their study the authors used the method of structural analysis of legal texts and their content, the hermeneutical method to understand the "logic" of contemporary issues, as reflected in the law, the historical method to trace the development of environmental law and other methods.
References

1. Vernadskii V.I. Filosofskie mysli naturalista. M. : Nauka, 1988. 522 s.

2. Reimers N. F. Ekologiya (teorii, zakony, pravila printsipy i gipotezy) M. : Zhurnal «Rossiya Molodaya», 1994. 367 s.

3. Ekologicheskoe pravo / pod red. S. A. Bogolyubova. M. : Yurait, 2011. 482 s.

4. Howarth W. The Progression towards Ecological Quality Standards // Journal of Environmental Law. 2009. Vol. 18 (1). R. 3-35.

5. Rolston H. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988. 391 p.

6. Sepanmaa Y. The Beauty of Environment: A General Model for Environmental Aesthetics. Second Edition. Denton : Environmental Ethics Books, 1993. 191 p.

7. Schweitzer A. Civilization and Ethics. London : Unwin Books, 1967. 253 p.

8. Gobbs T. Leviafan. M. : Mysl', 2001. 408 s.

9. Stokgol'm 1972. Doklad konferentsii Organizatsii Ob\"edinennykh Natsii po problemam okruzhayushchei cheloveka sredy // Organizatsii Ob\"edinennykh Natsii. Programma Okhrany Okruzhayushchei Sredy. URL: http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp? DocumentID=97 (data obrashcheniya: 14.06.2016).

10. Rio-de-Zhaneirskaya deklaratsiya po okruzhayushchei srede i razvitiyu // Deklaratsii. URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/ decl_conv/declarations/riodecl (data obrashcheniya: 14.06.2016).

11. Khmelevskaya S. A., Yablokova N.I. Sistema form postizheniya bytiya v kontekste sovremennoi kul'tury // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Ser. Filosofskie nauki. 2013. № 2. S. 74-78.

12. Ekologicheskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. M. : Noosfera, 2002. 930 s.

13. De Lucia V. Competing Narratives and Complex Genealogies: The Ecosystem Approach in International Environmental Law // Journal of Environmental Law. 2010. Vol. 27, is. 1. P. 91-117.

14. Mezhdunarodnoe ekologicheskoe pravo // Globalistika: Mezhdunarodnyi entsiklopedicheskii slovar'. Moskva ; Sankt-Peterburg ; N'yu-Iork : ELIMA ; Piter, 2006. 1160 s.

15. Anisimov V.P. Problemy sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo ekologicheskogo prava i sposoby ikh resheniya // Vestnik RGGU. 2010. № 4. S. 114-123.

16. Chichvarin V.A. Konventsiya o lovle ustrits i rybolovstve u beregov Velikobritanii i Frantsii. Podpisana v Parizhe 02.08.1839 g. // Mezhdunarodnye soglasheniya po okhrane prirody : sb. dok. M. : Yurid. lit., 1966. 420 s.

17. Kobylyanskii V. A. Filosofiya ekologii. M. : FAIR-PRESS, 2003. 192 s.

18. Definition of Biosafety // WTO Law. Science. GMOs. URL: http://www.ecolomics-international.org/headg_biosafety.htm (data obrashcheniya: 10.03.2016).