Журналов:     Статей:        

Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2016; : 179-185

Проблемы использования тактических приемов в ходе проведения экспериментальных следственных действий

Ахмедшин Р. Л.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/407/28

Аннотация

Рассматривается комплекс проблем, характерный для экспериментальных следственных действий (проверки показаний, предъявления для опознания и следственного эксперимента). Проблемы использования тактических приемов в ходе проведения следственных действий разделены на две группы. В первую группу вошли проблемы, характерные для всех следственных действий, во вторую - для экспериментальных следственных действий. Многие проблемы, раскрытые в статье, анализируются впервые в отечественной криминалистической науке.
Список литературы

1. Шейфер С. А. Следственные действия. Основание, процессуальный порядок и доказательственное значение. М. : Юрлитинформ, 2004.

2. Алексеева Т.А. Основные проблемы исследования устной речи в криминалистике // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2014. № 383. С. 152-154.

3. Ведерников Н.Т. Личность преступника в криминалистике и криминологии // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2014. № 384. С. 148-152.

4. Мясищев В.Н. Психология отношений. Москва : Институт практической психологии ; Воронеж : НПО «МОДЭК», 1995.

5. Юань В.Л. Систематизация источников информации о личности допрашиваемого на этапе подготовки к допросу // Сборник материалов криминалистических чтений. Томск, 2015. № 11. С. 70-72.

Tomsk State University Journal. 2016; : 179-185

Problems of the use of tactics in the course of experimental investigation actions

Akhmedshin R. L.

https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/407/28

Abstract

The low level of knowledge among law enforcement officials, as well as their lack of professionalism, is not the globally determining cause of ignoring the urgency of the use in the investigation of the tactical and forensic means to ensure the investigation. Without a doubt, in practice, these reasons appear fragmentarily and determine the elements of non-professionalism of law enforcement personnel, but these reasons can not be recognized on the system level. The above determines a number of problems in the use of tactics in the course of investigation which sum up to the following: • tactical options must be adapted to the person who uses them and the person to whom they are applied; • representatives of the epileptic type, to which a large number of inspectors and investigators belong, do not mostly tend to follow the rules that are not fixed in the regulations, and tactical and forensic recommendations are this kind of rules; • people in general are not inclined to be guided by tactical recommendations in their usual activities, and, in particular, such an attitude also applies to the tactics of investigative activity optimization. The above also identifies a number of problems in the use of tactics in the course of experimental investigation which sum up in the following: • experimental investigative actions seem simple, which often determines the tendency to perceive algorithms of these investigative actions in a non-creative way; • investigators must overcome the tendency to an impersonal perception of the person checked, which will lead to an understanding that the tactical optimization of an experimental investigative action is also determined by the optimization of the psychic potential of the person checked; • a high degree of procedural regulation does not objectively determine the simplicity of experimental investigation and must not allow the perception of experimental investigation as simple in content and as complicated mainly at the level of its organizational preparations. Like any problem unconscious for a person, the problem of ignoring the need for tactical and forensic arsenal use is solved in the process of repeatedly iterative problem actualization. Further training of law enforcement officers is seen not only in the provision of additional knowledge, but also in the formation of critical perception of their own psychic potential. It is in the context of the tactics of experimental investigation that the abovesaid is most important.
References

1. Sheifer S. A. Sledstvennye deistviya. Osnovanie, protsessual'nyi poryadok i dokazatel'stvennoe znachenie. M. : Yurlitinform, 2004.

2. Alekseeva T.A. Osnovnye problemy issledovaniya ustnoi rechi v kriminalistike // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 383. S. 152-154.

3. Vedernikov N.T. Lichnost' prestupnika v kriminalistike i kriminologii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2014. № 384. S. 148-152.

4. Myasishchev V.N. Psikhologiya otnoshenii. Moskva : Institut prakticheskoi psikhologii ; Voronezh : NPO «MODEK», 1995.

5. Yuan' V.L. Sistematizatsiya istochnikov informatsii o lichnosti doprashivaemogo na etape podgotovki k doprosu // Sbornik materialov kriminalisticheskikh chtenii. Tomsk, 2015. № 11. S. 70-72.