Журналов:     Статей:        

Травматология и ортопедия России. 2011; : 109-114

ОСОБЕННОСТИ РАБОТЫ РЕГИСТРА ЭНДОПРОТЕЗИРОВАНИЯ ТАЗОБЕДРЕННОГО СУСТАВА РНИИТО им. Р.Р. ВРЕДЕНА

Дроздова П. В., Тихилов Р. М., Гончаров М. Ю., Муравьева Ю. В.

https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-109-114

Аннотация

Представлен опыт четырехлетней работы регистра эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава РНИИТО им. Р. Р. Вредена. Описаны особенности и недостатки в организации и программном обеспечении. Выявленные проблемы будут учтены при совершенствовании и создании новой WEB-версии регистра.

Список литературы

1. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2005. http://www.dhr.dk.

2. Espehaug B. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register / B. Espehaug [et al.] // Acta Orthop. – 2006. – Vol. 77, N 1. – P. 49–56.

3. Havelin, L.I. The Norwegian Joint Registry / L.I. Havelin // Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis. – 1999. – Vol. 58. – P. 139–147.

4. Herberts P. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacements: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases / P. Herberts, H. Malchau // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 2000. – Vol. 71. – P. 111–121.

5. Kolling, C. Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register / C. Kolling, B.R. Simmen, G. Labek, J. Goldhahn // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 89-B, N 12. – P. 1567–1573.

6. Macau, H. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register / H. Malchau [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 84-A, Suppl. 2. – P. 2–20.

7. Pedersen A.B. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications / A.B. Pedersen [et al.] // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 2004. – Vol. 75, N 4. – P. 434-441.

8. Ruder, Ch. The Swiss Orthopaedic Registry / Ch. Roder [et al.] // Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis. – 2005. – Vol. 63. – P. 15–19.

9. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2005. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se.

Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2011; : 109-114

FEATURES OF HIP ARTHROPLASTY REGISTER IN RNIITO n.a. R.R. VREDEN

Drozdova P. V., Tikhilov R. M., Goncharov M. Yu., Muravieva Yu. V.

https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2011-0-3-109-114

Abstract

The four-year experience of the hip arthroplasty register of RNIITO n.a. R.R.Vreden is presented. Features and lacks of the organization and the software are described. The revealed problems will be considered at perfection and creation of the new WEB-version of the register.

References

1. Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2005. http://www.dhr.dk.

2. Espehaug B. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register / B. Espehaug [et al.] // Acta Orthop. – 2006. – Vol. 77, N 1. – P. 49–56.

3. Havelin, L.I. The Norwegian Joint Registry / L.I. Havelin // Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis. – 1999. – Vol. 58. – P. 139–147.

4. Herberts P. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacements: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases / P. Herberts, H. Malchau // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 2000. – Vol. 71. – P. 111–121.

5. Kolling, C. Key factors for a successful National Arthroplasty Register / C. Kolling, B.R. Simmen, G. Labek, J. Goldhahn // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2007. – Vol. 89-B, N 12. – P. 1567–1573.

6. Macau, H. The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register / H. Malchau [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 84-A, Suppl. 2. – P. 2–20.

7. Pedersen A.B. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry. Completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications / A.B. Pedersen [et al.] // Acta Orthop. Scand. – 2004. – Vol. 75, N 4. – P. 434-441.

8. Ruder, Ch. The Swiss Orthopaedic Registry / Ch. Roder [et al.] // Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis. – 2005. – Vol. 63. – P. 15–19.

9. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2005. http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se.