Акушерство и Гинекология Санкт-Петербурга. 2017; : 87-90
К вопросу о выборе селективного переноса одного эмбриона при помощи математического моделирования (обзор литературы)
Аннотация
В статье приведен анализ взглядов исследователей на пути оптимизации выбора селективного переноса одного эмбриона. На сегодняшний день с использованием математического методов достаточно изучены некоторые прогностические факторы, а также показана экономическая эффективность селективного переноса одного эмбриона.
Список литературы
1. Rauh-Hain J.A., Rana S., Tamez H., Wang A., Cohen B., Cohen A. et al. Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22: 293–299. DOI: 10.1080/14767050802663194.
2. Sibai B.M., Hauth J., Caritis S., Lindheimer M.D., MacPherson C., Klebanoff M. et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 182: 938–942. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70350-4.
3. Russo F.M., Pozzi E., Pelizzoni F., Todyrenchuk L., Bernasconi D.P., Cozzoline S. et al. Stillbirths in singletons, dichorionic and monochorionic twins: a comparison of risks and causes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 170: 131– 136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.014.
4. Mastroiacovo P., Castilla E.E., Arpino C., Botting B., Cocchi G., Goujard J. et al. Congenital malformations in twins: an international study. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999; 83: 117–24. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990312)83:23<117::aidajmg7>E3.0.co;2-4.
5. Lemos E.V., Zhang D., Van Voorhis B.J., Hu X.H. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs. singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 209: 586.e1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.005.
6. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97: 835–842. DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050.
7. Coetsier T., Dhont M. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who’s afraid of single embryo transfer? Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 2663–2664. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2663.
8. Cutting R., Morroll D., Roberts S.A., Pickering S., Rutherford A. Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum. Fertil. (Camb). 2008; 11: 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/14647270802302629.
9. Templeton A., Morris J.K., Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Lancet. 1996; 348: 1402–1406. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)0529191998.
10. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Van de Meerssche M., Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14: 2581–2587. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_3.8-a.
11. Hunault C.C., Eijkemans M.J., Pieters M.H., Te Velde E.R., Habbema J.D., Fauser B.C. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 77: 725–732. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03243-5.
12. Zhou H., Weinberg C.R. Evaluating effects of exposures on embryo viability and uterine receptivity in in vitro fertilization. Stat. Med. 1998; 17: 1601–1612.19. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:14
13. Speirs A.L., Lopata A., Gronow M.J., Kellow G.N., Johnston W.I. Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 1983; 39: 468–471. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46933-5.
14. De Neubourg D., Gerris J., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Vercruyssen M., Elseviers M. Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19 (6): 1476–1479. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh283.
15. Ottosen L.D., Kesmodel U., Hindkjaer J., Ingerslev H.J. Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients – do we need more information? J. Assist. Reprod. Gen. 2007; 24: 29–36. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9082-9.
16. Thurin A., Hausken J., Hillensjo T., Jablonowska B., Pinborg A., Strandell A. et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351: 2392–2402. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa041032.
17. Verberg M.F., Eijkemans M.J., Macklon N.S., Heijnen E.M., Fauser B.C., Broekmans F.J. Predictors of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 89: 1159–1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.020.
18. Kallen B., Finnstrom O., Lindam A., Nilsson E., Nygren K.G., Otterblad O.P. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden: data for 25 years. Hum. Reprod. 2010b; 25: 1026–1034. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq003.
19. Roberts S.A., McGowan L., Mark Hirst W., Vail A., Rutherford A., Lieberman B.A. et al. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26 (3): 569–575. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq352.
20. Gleicher N., Campbell D.P., Chan C.L., Karande V., Rao R., Balin M. et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10: 1079–1084. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136098.
21. Goldfarb J., Kinzer D.J., Boyle M., Kurit D. Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil. Steril. 1996; 65: 815–820. DOI: 10.1016/ s0015-0282(16)58220-x.
22. Pinborg A., Loft A., Schmidt L., Andersen A.N. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18: 621– 627. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg145.
23. Porter M., Bhattacharya S. Investigation of staff and patients’ opinions of aproposed trial of elective single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20: 2523– 2530. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei094.
24. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97: 835–842. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2011.11.050.
25. Jacobs M.B., Klonoff-Cohen H., Agarwal S., Kritz-Silverstein D., Lindsay S., Garzo V.G. Predictors of treatment failure in young patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016; 33 (8): 1001–1007. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0725-1.
26. Crawford S., Boulet S.L., Mneimneh A.S., Perkins K.M., Jamieson D.J., Zhang Y. et al. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105 (2): 444–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032.
Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Saint-Petersburg. 2017; : 87-90
Choice for single embryo transfer: mathematical modelling (literature review)
Abstract
This literature review provides an analysis of the views of researchers on the path of optimizing the choice of elective single embryo transfer. Today, with the help of mathematical analysis, several predictive factors have been studied and shown to be cost-effective of elective single embryo transfer.
References
1. Rauh-Hain J.A., Rana S., Tamez H., Wang A., Cohen B., Cohen A. et al. Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22: 293–299. DOI: 10.1080/14767050802663194.
2. Sibai B.M., Hauth J., Caritis S., Lindheimer M.D., MacPherson C., Klebanoff M. et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 182: 938–942. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70350-4.
3. Russo F.M., Pozzi E., Pelizzoni F., Todyrenchuk L., Bernasconi D.P., Cozzoline S. et al. Stillbirths in singletons, dichorionic and monochorionic twins: a comparison of risks and causes. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 170: 131– 136. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.06.014.
4. Mastroiacovo P., Castilla E.E., Arpino C., Botting B., Cocchi G., Goujard J. et al. Congenital malformations in twins: an international study. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999; 83: 117–24. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19990312)83:23<117::aidajmg7>E3.0.co;2-4.
5. Lemos E.V., Zhang D., Van Voorhis B.J., Hu X.H. Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs. singleton pregnancies in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 209: 586.e1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.10.005.
6. Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97: 835–842. DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.050.
7. Coetsier T., Dhont M. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in in-vitro fertilization: who’s afraid of single embryo transfer? Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 2663–2664. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2663.
8. Cutting R., Morroll D., Roberts S.A., Pickering S., Rutherford A. Elective single embryo transfer: guidelines for practice British Fertility Society and Association of Clinical Embryologists. Hum. Fertil. (Camb). 2008; 11: 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/14647270802302629.
9. Templeton A., Morris J.K., Parslow W. Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Lancet. 1996; 348: 1402–1406. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(96)0529191998.
10. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Van de Meerssche M., Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14: 2581–2587. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.suppl_3.8-a.
11. Hunault C.C., Eijkemans M.J., Pieters M.H., Te Velde E.R., Habbema J.D., Fauser B.C. A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2002; 77: 725–732. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)03243-5.
12. Zhou H., Weinberg C.R. Evaluating effects of exposures on embryo viability and uterine receptivity in in vitro fertilization. Stat. Med. 1998; 17: 1601–1612.19. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980730)17:14
13. Speirs A.L., Lopata A., Gronow M.J., Kellow G.N., Johnston W.I. Analysis of the benefits and risks of multiple embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 1983; 39: 468–471. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)46933-5.
14. De Neubourg D., Gerris J., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Vercruyssen M., Elseviers M. Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19 (6): 1476–1479. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh283.
15. Ottosen L.D., Kesmodel U., Hindkjaer J., Ingerslev H.J. Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients – do we need more information? J. Assist. Reprod. Gen. 2007; 24: 29–36. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-006-9082-9.
16. Thurin A., Hausken J., Hillensjo T., Jablonowska B., Pinborg A., Strandell A. et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351: 2392–2402. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa041032.
17. Verberg M.F., Eijkemans M.J., Macklon N.S., Heijnen E.M., Fauser B.C., Broekmans F.J. Predictors of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 89: 1159–1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.020.
18. Kallen B., Finnstrom O., Lindam A., Nilsson E., Nygren K.G., Otterblad O.P. Trends in delivery and neonatal outcome after in vitro fertilization in Sweden: data for 25 years. Hum. Reprod. 2010b; 25: 1026–1034. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq003.
19. Roberts S.A., McGowan L., Mark Hirst W., Vail A., Rutherford A., Lieberman B.A. et al. Reducing the incidence of twins from IVF treatments: predictive modelling from a retrospective cohort. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26 (3): 569–575. DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq352.
20. Gleicher N., Campbell D.P., Chan C.L., Karande V., Rao R., Balin M. et al. The desire for multiple births in couples with infertility problems contradicts present practice patterns. Hum. Reprod. 1995; 10: 1079–1084. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136098.
21. Goldfarb J., Kinzer D.J., Boyle M., Kurit D. Attitudes of in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination couples toward multiple gestation pregnancy and multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil. Steril. 1996; 65: 815–820. DOI: 10.1016/ s0015-0282(16)58220-x.
22. Pinborg A., Loft A., Schmidt L., Andersen A.N. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18: 621– 627. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deg145.
23. Porter M., Bhattacharya S. Investigation of staff and patients’ opinions of aproposed trial of elective single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20: 2523– 2530. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei094.
24. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elective single-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2012; 97: 835–842. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2011.11.050.
25. Jacobs M.B., Klonoff-Cohen H., Agarwal S., Kritz-Silverstein D., Lindsay S., Garzo V.G. Predictors of treatment failure in young patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016; 33 (8): 1001–1007. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0725-1.
26. Crawford S., Boulet S.L., Mneimneh A.S., Perkins K.M., Jamieson D.J., Zhang Y. et al. Costs of achieving live birth from assisted reproductive technology: a comparison of sequential single and double embryo transfer approaches. Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105 (2): 444–450. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.10.032.
