Акушерство и Гинекология Санкт-Петербурга. 2017; : 65-69
Место робот-ассистированной лапароскопии в оперативной гинекологии
Аннотация
В статье рассмотрено применение хирургического робота da Vinci (DV) в гинекологии. DV является самой крупной технологической разработкой последних десятилетий. В настоящее время успешно используются около 4000 роботических установок в 54 развитых странах и 25 роботических установок в России (менее 0,05%). Спектр робот-ассистированных гинекологических вмешательств очень широк: от органосохраняющих операций до радикальной гистерэктомии.
Список литературы
1. Давыдов М.И., Кузнецов В.В., Нечушкина В.М. Лекции по онкогинекологии. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2009.
2. Прудков М.И., Шулутко А. М., Галмзянов Ф.В., Левит А.Л., Ковалевский А.Д., Алферов С.Ю. Основы минимально инвазивной хирургии. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Уральского университета; 2007.
3. Федоров А.В, Кригер А.Г., Берелавичус С.В., Ефанов М.Г., Горин Д.С. Робот-ассистированные операции в абдоминальной хирургии. Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2010; 1: 16–19.
4. Чиссов В.И., Старинский В.В., Петрова Г.В. Злокачественные новообразования в России в 2009 году (заболеваемость и смертность) М.: ФГУ «МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена Минздравсоцразвития России»; 2011.
5. Allendorf J.D., Bessler M., Whelan R.L. et al. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg. Endosc. 1997; 11: 427–430.
6. Camarillo D.B., Krummel T.M., Salisbury J.K. Jr. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am. J. Sung. 2004; 188 (4А Suppl): 2S–15S. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.025.
7. Curado M.P., Edwards B., Shin H.R., Storm H., Ferlay J., Heanue M., Boyle P. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. IX. IARC scientific publications No. 160. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2007.
8. Kim V.B., Chapman W.H., Albrecht R.J., Bailey B.M., Young J.A., Nifong L.W. et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 34–40.
9. Levinson K.L., Auer M., Escobar P.F. Evolving technologies in robotic surgery for minimally invasive treatment of gynecologic cancers. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2013; 10 (5): 603–610. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827509.
10. Mori K.M., Neubauer N.L. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 2013: 312982. DOI: 10.1155/2013/312982
11. Kwoh Y.S., Hou J., Jonckheere E.A., Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988; 35 (2): 153–160. DOI: 10.1109/10.1354.
12. Meeks G.R. Advanced laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2000; 80 (5): 1443–1464.
13. Nichols D.H. Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1993.
14. Satava R.M. Robotic surgery: from past to future – a personal journey. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2003; 83 (6): 1491–1500. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00168-3.
15. Satava R.M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan Tech. 2002; 12 (1): 6–16.
16. Stylopoulos N., Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2003; 83 (6): 1321–1337.
17. Subramaniam А., Kim K.H., Bryant S.A., Zhang B. et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 122 (3): 604–607. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.024.
18. Wu J.M., Wechter M.E., Geller E.J. Nguyen T.V., Visco A.G. Hysterectomy rates in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110 (5): 1091–1095. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.
19. Intuitive Surgical at Goldman Sachs Annual Global Healthcare Conference. 2014. Available from: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome
20. Intuitive Surgical at Goldman Sachs Annual Global Healthcare Conference. 2015. Available from: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome
Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Saint-Petersburg. 2017; : 65-69
Robotic surgery in gynecology
Abstract
The article describes the use of a da Vinci-assisted (DV) gynecological surgery. DV is the biggest technological development of the recent decades. Currently, over 4000 robotic surgical systems in 54 developed countries and 25 robotic surgical systems in Russia have been used successfully. The type of robot-аssistedgynecological interventions is wide: from uterussparing surgery to radical hysterectomy.
References
1. Davydov M.I., Kuznetsov V.V., Nechushkina V.M. Lektsii po onkoginekologii. M.: MEDpress-inform; 2009.
2. Prudkov M.I., Shulutko A. M., Galmzyanov F.V., Levit A.L., Kovalevskii A.D., Alferov S.Yu. Osnovy minimal'no invazivnoi khirurgii. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta; 2007.
3. Fedorov A.V, Kriger A.G., Berelavichus S.V., Efanov M.G., Gorin D.S. Robot-assistirovannye operatsii v abdominal'noi khirurgii. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2010; 1: 16–19.
4. Chissov V.I., Starinskii V.V., Petrova G.V. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2009 godu (zabolevaemost' i smertnost') M.: FGU «MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena Minzdravsotsrazvitiya Rossii»; 2011.
5. Allendorf J.D., Bessler M., Whelan R.L. et al. Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model. Surg. Endosc. 1997; 11: 427–430.
6. Camarillo D.B., Krummel T.M., Salisbury J.K. Jr. Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am. J. Sung. 2004; 188 (4A Suppl): 2S–15S. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.025.
7. Curado M.P., Edwards B., Shin H.R., Storm H., Ferlay J., Heanue M., Boyle P. Cancer incidence in five continents. Vol. IX. IARC scientific publications No. 160. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2007.
8. Kim V.B., Chapman W.H., Albrecht R.J., Bailey B.M., Young J.A., Nifong L.W. et al. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan Tech. 2002; 12: 34–40.
9. Levinson K.L., Auer M., Escobar P.F. Evolving technologies in robotic surgery for minimally invasive treatment of gynecologic cancers. Expert Review of Medical Devices. 2013; 10 (5): 603–610. DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827509.
10. Mori K.M., Neubauer N.L. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology. 2013; 2013: 312982. DOI: 10.1155/2013/312982
11. Kwoh Y.S., Hou J., Jonckheere E.A., Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1988; 35 (2): 153–160. DOI: 10.1109/10.1354.
12. Meeks G.R. Advanced laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2000; 80 (5): 1443–1464.
13. Nichols D.H. Gynecologic and Obstetric Surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1993.
14. Satava R.M. Robotic surgery: from past to future – a personal journey. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2003; 83 (6): 1491–1500. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00168-3.
15. Satava R.M. Surgical robotics: the early chronicles: a personal historical perspective. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan Tech. 2002; 12 (1): 6–16.
16. Stylopoulos N., Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2003; 83 (6): 1321–1337.
17. Subramaniam A., Kim K.H., Bryant S.A., Zhang B. et al. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Gynecologic Oncology. 2011; 122 (3): 604–607. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.05.024.
18. Wu J.M., Wechter M.E., Geller E.J. Nguyen T.V., Visco A.G. Hysterectomy rates in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110 (5): 1091–1095. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.
19. Intuitive Surgical at Goldman Sachs Annual Global Healthcare Conference. 2014. Available from: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome
20. Intuitive Surgical at Goldman Sachs Annual Global Healthcare Conference. 2015. Available from: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome
