ВАРИАНТ ЛЕЧЕНИЯ ДИСТАЛЬНОЙ ФОРМЫ ГИПОСПАДИИ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ТЕХНИКИ F-II (МОДИФИКАЦИЯ HODGSON-II)

Статья в Elpub

Детская хирургия. Журнал им. Ю.Ф. Исакова. 2018; 22: 9-12

ВАРИАНТ ЛЕЧЕНИЯ ДИСТАЛЬНОЙ ФОРМЫ ГИПОСПАДИИ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ТЕХНИКИ F-II (МОДИФИКАЦИЯ HODGSON-II)

Файзулин А. К., Машков А. Е., Шарков С. М., Соболевский А. Б., Соболевский А. А., Стрелкина Л. А., Колосова П. А., Чуприков В. В.

https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2018-22-1-9-12

Аннотация

Список литературы

1. Hadidi A.T., Okoro P.E. Hypospadias. Chapter 94 in Paediatric Surgery: A comprehensive text for Africa. Global Health Education Low-cost Publications. 2010; Vol. II. Available exclusively in PDF format.

2. Файзулин А.К. Гипоспадия. http://www.fayzulin.ru/directions/gipospadiya.

3. Dokter E.M., Mouës C.M., Rooij I.A., Biezen J.J. Complications after Hypospadias Correction: Prognostic Factors and Impact on Final Clinical Outcome. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2017; doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599230. [Epub ahead of print]

4. Hansson E, Becker M, Åberg M, Svenson H. Analysis of complications after repair of hypospadias. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 2007; 41: 120-4.

5. Файзулин А.К., Поддубный И,В,, Шарков С.М. Опыт оперативного лечения детей с гипоспадией по методике Onlay-tube. Детская хирургия. 2016; 20(5): 239-42.

6. Lee OT, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA. Predictors of secondary surgery after hypospadias repair: a population based analysis of 5,000 patients. J. Urol. 2013; 190(1): 251-5.

7. Bush N.C., Holzer M., Zhang S., Snodgrass W. Age does not impact risk for urethroplasty complications after tubularized incised plate repair of hypospadias in prepubertal boys. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2013; 9(3): 252-6.

8. Hadidi A.T., Azmy A.F. Principles of Hypospadias Surgery. Chapter 8 in Hypospadias Surgery: An Illustrated Guide. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2004.

9. Hodgson N.B. A one-stage hipospadias repair. J. Urol. 1970; 104: 281-4.

10. Лопаткин Н.А., Шевцов И.П. Оперативная урология. Ленинград: Медицина; 1986; 280-4.

Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 2018; 22: 9-12

A TREATMENT OPTION FOR THE DISTAL FORM OF HYPOSPADIA WITH THE USE OF F-II TECHNIQUES (HODGSON-II MODIFICATION)

Fayzulin A. K., Mashkov A. E., Sharkov S. M., Sobolevskiy A. B., Sobolevskiy A. A., Strelkina L. A., Kolosova P. A., Chuprikov V. V.

https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9510-2018-22-1-9-12

Abstract

Introduction. At the moment present, the problem of choosing the method of correction of distal hypospadias due to persistent numerous postoperative complications has not been completely solved. The most frequent complications are fistulas, stenoses and lysis of neo-urethra. Distal hypospadias is divided into distal stem, coronary and capitate. Features of the anatomical structure of the head, prep and meatus in children with hypospadia are often explained by a deficit of plastic material, which can lead to mistakes in the choice of the method of urethroplasty. The current principles of plastic surgery still do not completely eliminate postoperative complications. Material and methods. Since 2004, due to using the F-II procedure 208 operations have been performed without complications mentioned above. At the moment, the long-term results are being investigated. Results. Prolonged search for the optimal approach for the correction of distal forms of hypospadias suggests the need to modify the Hodgson-II technique and introduce it into clinical practice. In this article, the advantages and principal differences of the operation of F-II in comparison with Hodgson-II modification, a brief literary reference about the current world studies of the complications of distal urethroplasty are presented. Conclusion. When using the urethroplasty with a displaced prepuce flap according to the F-II procedure, we get an advantage over the stock of plastic material in comparison with urethroplasty by local tissues. Compared with the Hodgson technique, we get the best cosmetic and functional result.

References

2. Faizulin A.K. Gipospadiya. http://www.fayzulin.ru/directions/gipospadiya.

4. Hansson E, Becker M, Åberg M, Svenson H. Analysis of complications after repair of hypospadias. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 2007; 41: 120-4.

5. Faizulin A.K., Poddubnyi I,V,, Sharkov S.M. Opyt operativnogo lecheniya detei s gipospadiei po metodike Onlay-tube. Detskaya khirurgiya. 2016; 20(5): 239-42.

6. Lee OT, Durbin-Johnson B, Kurzrock EA. Predictors of secondary surgery after hypospadias repair: a population based analysis of 5,000 patients. J. Urol. 2013; 190(1): 251-5.

8. Hadidi A.T., Azmy A.F. Principles of Hypospadias Surgery. Chapter 8 in Hypospadias Surgery: An Illustrated Guide. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer; 2004.

9. Hodgson N.B. A one-stage hipospadias repair. J. Urol. 1970; 104: 281-4.

10. Lopatkin N.A., Shevtsov I.P. Operativnaya urologiya. Leningrad: Meditsina; 1986; 280-4.