Ориенталистика. 2021; 4: 1219-1237
Между Средневековьем и Новым временем: датировка нескольких фрагментов еврейско-персидской рукописи (С40 Евр. фонда ИВР РАН)
https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2021-4-5-1219-1237Аннотация
В статье рассматриваются палеографические и кодикологические аспекты нескольких фрагментов недатированного конволюта С40 из Еврейского фонда Института восточных рукописей РАН. Это список «Муса-наме» Шахина, сформированный из большого количества разрозненных отрывков. По-видимому, три крупных фрагмента рукописи – это части средневековых рукописей, которые оказались в руках одного мастера-«реставратора» в XIX в. Основываясь на сравнительно-историческом методе, автор предлагает вариант возможной датировки каждого фрагмента, считая, что перед нами отрывки рукописей конца XV – начала XVI в., созданных в регионе, где расположены города Кум и Кашан в Иране. Более точную локализацию сегодня, к сожалению, установить не удается. Однако большинством тех же свойств писчего материала, типа и вида письма, а также характером фиксации текста в памятнике (аппаратом работы писца с текстом) обладают несколько датированных и исследованных еврейских рукописей этого периода и этого региона. Датировка исследуемых фрагментов позволит ввести рукопись в научный оборот как один из редких средневековых памятников евреев Востока.
Список литературы
1. Moreen V. B. Catalog of Judeo-Persian Manuscripts in the Library of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. Leiden, Boston: Brill; 2015. 488 p. DOI: 10.1163/9789004281301.
2. Белкина Е. М. Ранние этапы реставрации двух еврейско-персидских средневековых рукописей. Вещь – символ – знак в славянскои и евреискои культурнои традиции. М.: Сэфер; 2019. С. 61–74. DOI: 10.31168/2658-3356.2019.4.
3. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. The National Library of Israel. SfarData. .ספר-דתאThe Codicological Data-Base of the Hebrew Palaeography Project. – Available from: http://sfardata.nli.org.il/startSearch_He [Accessed 2nd September 2021].
4. Beit-Arie M. Why Comparative Codicology? Gazette du Livre Médiéval. 1993;23(1):1–5. DOI: 10.3406/galim.1993.1245.
5. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Check list for observation and evaluation of Hebrew script. Instrumenta BwB 2, 2013. – Available from: http://hebrewmanuscript.com/instrumenta.htm [Accessed 15th October 2021].
6. Beit-Arie M. Hebrew Codicology. In: Bausi A., Borbone P. G., Briquel-Chatonnet et al. (eds) Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies: An Introduction. Hamburg: COMSt; 2015. P. 54–55, 208–234. DOI: 10.1353/mns.2016.0004
7. Якерсон С. М. Евреиская средневековая книга: Кодикологические, палеографические и книговедческие аспекты. М.: РГГУ; 2003. 253, [1] c.
8. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Early Babylonian ‘Documentary’ Script: Diplomatic and Palaeographical Study of Two Geonic Letters from the British Library Cairo Genizah Collection. Manuscrits hébreux et arabes: Mélanges en l’honneur de Colette Sirat. Turnhout: Brepols; 2014. P. 177–195. DOI: 10.1484/M.BIB.1.102091
9. Beit-Arie M., Engel E., Yardeni A. Specimens of Mediaeval Hebrew Scripts. Vol. I: Oriental and Yemenite Scripts. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; 1987. 325 p. (На ивр.)
10. Yardeni A. The Book of Hebrew Script: History, Paleography, Script Styles, Calligraphy & Design. Delaware: Oak Knoll; 2003. 355 p.
11. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Glossary of Difficult Words in the Babylonian Talmud (Seder Mo’ed) on a Rotulus. In: Brooke G. J., Smithuis R. (eds) Jewish Education from Antiquity to the Middle Ages: Studies in Honour of Philip S. Alexander. Leiden: Brill; 2017. P. 297–323. DOI: 10.1163/9789004347762_014.
12. Netser A. Manuscripts of the Jews of Persia in the Ben Zvi Institute. Jerusalem: Makhon Yad ben Tsvi; 1985. 234 p. (На ивр.)
13. Loveday H. Islamic Paper: a Study of the Ancient Craft. London: Archetype Books; 2007. 90 p.
14. Beit-Arie M. The Oriental Arabic Paper. Gazette du Livre Médiéval. 1996;28(1):9–12. DOI: 10.3406/galim.1996.1329.
Orientalistica. 2021; 4: 1219-1237
Medieval or Early Pre-Modern? Dating Several Fragments from a Judeo-Persian Manuscript (C40 Hebrew, the IOM RAS)
https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2021-4-5-1219-1237Abstract
The article examines some paleographic and codicological aspects of several fragments of the undated manuscript C40 from the Hebrew Collection in the Institute of Oriental Manuscripts of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IOM RAS). This is a codex of Shahin's Musa-name, formed from some different, scattered fragments. Apparently, three large fragments of this manuscript are taken from medieval codices, which were gathered by one person (the so-called “restorer”) in the 19th century. Judging from the results of their comparative and historical analysis, one can suggest some possibilities for dating of each fragment. The author dates these fragments back to the late 15th early 16th centuries C.E. According to her, they were transcribed in the region where the cities of Qum and Kashan are located (the current provinces of Qum and Isfahan in Iran). Unfortunately, it is hardly possible to provide a more accurate localization. However, several dated and previously studied Jewish manuscripts from this period and this area have nearly the same attributes, quality, or characteristics of the writing material and the type of writing, as well as some textual pattern.
References
1. Moreen V. B. Catalog of Judeo-Persian Manuscripts in the Library of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America. Leiden, Boston: Brill; 2015. 488 p. DOI: 10.1163/9789004281301.
2. Belkina E. M. Rannie etapy restavratsii dvukh evreisko-persidskikh srednevekovykh rukopisei. Veshch' – simvol – znak v slavyanskoi i evreiskoi kul'turnoi traditsii. M.: Sefer; 2019. S. 61–74. DOI: 10.31168/2658-3356.2019.4.
3. The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. The National Library of Israel. SfarData. .ספר-דתאThe Codicological Data-Base of the Hebrew Palaeography Project. – Available from: http://sfardata.nli.org.il/startSearch_He [Accessed 2nd September 2021].
4. Beit-Arie M. Why Comparative Codicology? Gazette du Livre Médiéval. 1993;23(1):1–5. DOI: 10.3406/galim.1993.1245.
5. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Check list for observation and evaluation of Hebrew script. Instrumenta BwB 2, 2013. – Available from: http://hebrewmanuscript.com/instrumenta.htm [Accessed 15th October 2021].
6. Beit-Arie M. Hebrew Codicology. In: Bausi A., Borbone P. G., Briquel-Chatonnet et al. (eds) Comparative Oriental Manuscript Studies: An Introduction. Hamburg: COMSt; 2015. P. 54–55, 208–234. DOI: 10.1353/mns.2016.0004
7. Yakerson S. M. Evreiskaya srednevekovaya kniga: Kodikologicheskie, paleograficheskie i knigovedcheskie aspekty. M.: RGGU; 2003. 253, [1] c.
8. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Early Babylonian ‘Documentary’ Script: Diplomatic and Palaeographical Study of Two Geonic Letters from the British Library Cairo Genizah Collection. Manuscrits hébreux et arabes: Mélanges en l’honneur de Colette Sirat. Turnhout: Brepols; 2014. P. 177–195. DOI: 10.1484/M.BIB.1.102091
9. Beit-Arie M., Engel E., Yardeni A. Specimens of Mediaeval Hebrew Scripts. Vol. I: Oriental and Yemenite Scripts. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; 1987. 325 p. (Na ivr.)
10. Yardeni A. The Book of Hebrew Script: History, Paleography, Script Styles, Calligraphy & Design. Delaware: Oak Knoll; 2003. 355 p.
11. Olszowy-Schlanger J. Glossary of Difficult Words in the Babylonian Talmud (Seder Mo’ed) on a Rotulus. In: Brooke G. J., Smithuis R. (eds) Jewish Education from Antiquity to the Middle Ages: Studies in Honour of Philip S. Alexander. Leiden: Brill; 2017. P. 297–323. DOI: 10.1163/9789004347762_014.
12. Netser A. Manuscripts of the Jews of Persia in the Ben Zvi Institute. Jerusalem: Makhon Yad ben Tsvi; 1985. 234 p. (Na ivr.)
13. Loveday H. Islamic Paper: a Study of the Ancient Craft. London: Archetype Books; 2007. 90 p.
14. Beit-Arie M. The Oriental Arabic Paper. Gazette du Livre Médiéval. 1996;28(1):9–12. DOI: 10.3406/galim.1996.1329.
