Журналов:     Статей:        

Офтальмохирургия. 2021; : 39-45

Сравнительная характеристика результатов применения разнонаправленной интравитреальной фармакотерапии в лечении диабетического макулярного отека

Бикбов М. М., Кудоярова К. И., Зайнуллин Р. М., Гильманшин Т. Р.

https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2021-1-39-45

Аннотация

Цель. Провести сравнительный анализ эффективности интравитреального введения (ИВВ) препарата группы глюкокортикостероидов – имплантата с дексаметазоном и ингибитора ангиогенеза – афлиберцепта при макулярном отеке у пациентов с сахарным диабетом.

Материал и методы. В исследовании участвовали 80 пациентов (80 глаз) с диабетическим макулярным отеком. В 1-ю группу исследования вошли 38 пациентов (38 глаз), которым было выполнено однократное ИВВ дексаметазон-содержащего биодеградируемого имплантата «Озурдекс» в дозе 0,7 мг по стандартной методике. Во 2-й группе 42 пациентам (42 глаза) было выполнено 5 загрузочных доз афлиберцепта с интервалом 1 мес. Всем пациентам ежемесячно проводили спектральную оптическую когерентную томографию (ОКТ) макулярной области, а также визометрию и тонометрию на протяжении срока наблюдения (6 мес.).

Результаты. Через 1 мес. после ИВВ исследуемых препаратов в обеих группах воспалительных реакций ни в одном случае выявлено не было. По данным ОКТ, сохранялся кистозный отек макулярной области с тенденцией к уменьшению толщины в фовеа. После лечения афлиберцептом средняя толщина сетчатки в макуле составила 186,4±15,1 мкм, острота зрения в среднем составляла 0,48±0,05 у 85,7% пациентов. На фоне терапии ИВВ препарата «Озурдекс» повышение остроты зрения отмечали у 89,4% пациент ов.

Заключение. В ходе данного исследования установлено, что интравитреальная фармакотерапия блокатором ангиогенеза и имплантатом с дексаметазоном пациентам с диабетическим макулярным отеком сопоставима по своей эффективности – 85,7 и 89,4% соответственно. При отсутствии по ряду причин возможности проведения систематической антиангиогенной терапии целесообразно применение имплантанта с дексаметазоном пролонгированного действия.

Список литературы

1. Бикбов М.М., Гильманшин Т.Р., Зайнуллин Р.М., Кудоярова К.И. К вопросу об эпидемиологии сахарного диабета и диабетической ретинопатии в Республике Башкортостан. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(4): 66–69.

2. Бикбов М.М., Зайнуллин Р.М., Гильманшин Т.Р., Халимов Т.А. Сравнительный анализ отдаленных результатов хирургического лечения диабетического макулярного отека и эпиретинальной мембраны. Офтальмология. 2019;16(S1): 33–39.

3. Bikbov MM, Kazakbaeva GM, Gilmanshin TR, Zainullin RM, et al. Axial length and its associations in a Russian population: the ural eye and medical study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2): e0211186.

4. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984;91: 1464–1474. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1

5. Трахтенберг Ю.А., Аметов А.С., Демидова Т.Ю., Воробьева И.В. Антиоксидантная терапия непролиферативной диабетической ретинопатии. Врач. 2006;11: 15–18.

6. Haller JA, Schachat AP. Update on the pathophisiology, molecular biology, and treatment of macular edema. Advanced studies in ophthalmology. 2007;4(7): 178–190.

7. Cao Y. Positive and negative modulation of angiogenesis by VEGFR1 ligands. Sci Signal. 2009;2(59): re1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.259re1

8. Исхакова А.Г., Золотарев А.В., Викторов Д.А., Тороповский А.Н., Никитин А.Г. Роль факторов роста сосудов в развитии диабетической ретинопатии и макулярного отека. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2018;11(2): 62–69.

9. Ando R, Noda K, Namba S, et al. Aqueous humour levels of placental growth factor in diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92: 245–246. doi: 10.1111/aos.12251

10. Miyamoto N, de Kozak Y, Jeanny J, et al. Placental growth factor-1 and epithelial haemato-retinal barrier breakdown: potential implication in the pathogenesis of diabetic endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related ligands by VEGF Trap, ranibizumab and bevacizumab retinopathy. Diabetologia. 2007;50: 461–470. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0539-2

11. Papadopoulos N, Martin J, Ruan Q, et al. Binding and neutralization of vascular. Angiogenesis. 2012;15(2): 171–185. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9249-6

12. Санторо Э.Ю. Опыт применения афлиберцепта в лечении диабетического макулярного отека по стандартному протоколу в реальной клинической практике. Российский офтальмологический журнал. 2018;11(4): 80–85.

13. Leal EC, Manivannan A, Hosoya K, Terasaki T, Cunha-Vaz J, Ambrosio AF, Forrester JV. Inducible nitric oxide synthase isoform is a key mediator of leukostasis and blood-retinal barrier breakdown in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 5257–5265.

14. Zhang X, Zeng H, Bao S, Wang N, Gillies MC. Diabetic macular edema: new concepts in pathophysiology and treatment. Cell Biosci. 2014;4: 27. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-27.e

15. Adamis AP, Berman AJ. Immunological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30: 65–84. doi: 10.1007/s00281-008-0111-x

16. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA, Tamborlane WV, Danis RP, Hainsworth DP, Davis MD. Effect of prior intensive therapy in type 1 diabetes on 10- year progression of retinopathy in the DCCT/EDIC: comparison of adults and adolescents. Diabetes. 2010;59:1244–1253. doi: 10.2337/db09-1216

17. Stewart MW. Corticosteroid use for diabetic macular edema: old fad or new trend? Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12: 364–375. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0281-8

18. Sohn HJ, Han DH, Kim IT, Oh IK, Kim KH, Lee DY, Nam DH. Changes in aqueous concentrations of various cytokines after intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152: 686–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.033

19. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Garcia-Arumi J, Bandello F, et al. Guidelines for the management of diabetic macular edema by the european society of retina specialists (EURETINA). Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4): 185–222. doi: 10.1159/000458539

20. Tamura H, Miyamoto K, Kiryu J, et al. Intravitreal injection of corticosteroid attenuates leukostasis and vascular leakage in experimental diabetic retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 1440–1444. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0905

21. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 80–86. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5285

22. Haller JA, Kuppermann BD, Blumenkranz MS, et al. Dexamethasone DDS Phase II Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of an intravitreous dexamethasone drug delivery system in patients with diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:289–296. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.21

23. Kodjikian L. International pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema in real-life observational studies. Biomed Res Int. 2018;8: 8289253. doi: 10.1155/2018/8289253

24. Pacella E, Vestri AR, Muscella R, et al. Preliminary results of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7: 1423–1428. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S48364

25. Каменских Т.Г., Батищева Ю.С., Колбенев И.О. и др. Опыт антиангиогенной и кортикостероидной терапии диабетического макулярного отека. Саратовский научно-медицинский журнал. 2017;13(2): 383–388.

26. Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Gonzalez VH, et al. The DA VINCI study: Phase 2 primary results of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 1819–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.018

27. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology. 2015;122: 2044–2052. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.017

28. Korobelnik JF, Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121: 2247–2254. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006

29. Ziemssen F, Schlottman PG, Lim JI, et al. Initiation of intravitreal afliber-cept injection treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a review of VIVID DME and VISTA DME data. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016;2: 16. doi: 10.1186/s40942-016-0041-z

30. Marco A. Zarbin anti-VEGF agents and the risk of arteriothrombotic events. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2018;1: 63–67. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017495

31. Martínez AH, Delgado EP, Silva G, et al. Early versus late switch: How long should we extend the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in unresponsive diabetic macular edema patients? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;5: 1–8. doi: 10.1177/1120672119848257

32. Busch С, Zur D, Fraser‑Bell S, Laíns I, et al. Shall we stay, or shall we switch? Continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema. Acta Diabetologica. 2018;55: 789–796. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1151-x

Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2021; : 39-45

Comparative characteristics of the outcomes of the use of multidirectional intravitreal pharmacotherapy in the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Bikbov M. M., Kudoyarova K. I., Zainullin R. M., Gilmanshin T. R.

https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2021-1-39-45

Abstract

Purpose. To conduct a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of intravitreal injection of dexamethasone-containing implant and aflibercept in macular edema in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Material and methods. The study involved 80 patients (80 eyes) with macular edema. The group 1 included 38 patients (38 eyes) who underwent a single intravitreal injection of dexamethasone-containing biodegradable implant «Ozurdex» in a dose of 0.7 mg according to the standard technique. In the group 2, 42 patients (42 eyes) received 5 loading doses of aflibercept with an interval of one month. All patients underwent monthly spectral optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macular area, as well as visometry and tonometry during the observation period.

Results. One month after intravitreal injection of the studied drugs in both groups, no inflammatory reactions were detected in any case. According to OCT data, cystic edema of the macular area with a tendency to decrease the thickness in the fovea was preserved. After treatment with aflibercept, the average retinal thickness in the macula was 186.4±15.1 μm, and visual acuity averaged 0.48±0.05 in 85.7% of patients. During therapy with intravitreal injection of Ozurdex, an increase in visual acuity was noted in 89.4% of patients.

Conclusion. This study found that intravitreal pharmacotherapy with an angiogenesis blocker and a dexamethasone implant in patients with diabetic macular edema are comparable in its effectiveness – 85.7 and 89.4% respectively. If systematic anti-angiogenesis therapy is not possible for a number of reasons, it is advisable to use a prolonged dexamethasone implant.

References

1. Bikbov M.M., Gil'manshin T.R., Zainullin R.M., Kudoyarova K.I. K voprosu ob epidemiologii sakharnogo diabeta i diabeticheskoi retinopatii v Respublike Bashkortostan. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2019;4(4): 66–69.

2. Bikbov M.M., Zainullin R.M., Gil'manshin T.R., Khalimov T.A. Sravnitel'nyi analiz otdalennykh rezul'tatov khirurgicheskogo lecheniya diabeticheskogo makulyarnogo oteka i epiretinal'noi membrany. Oftal'mologiya. 2019;16(S1): 33–39.

3. Bikbov MM, Kazakbaeva GM, Gilmanshin TR, Zainullin RM, et al. Axial length and its associations in a Russian population: the ural eye and medical study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2): e0211186.

4. Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984;91: 1464–1474. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1

5. Trakhtenberg Yu.A., Ametov A.S., Demidova T.Yu., Vorob'eva I.V. Antioksidantnaya terapiya neproliferativnoi diabeticheskoi retinopatii. Vrach. 2006;11: 15–18.

6. Haller JA, Schachat AP. Update on the pathophisiology, molecular biology, and treatment of macular edema. Advanced studies in ophthalmology. 2007;4(7): 178–190.

7. Cao Y. Positive and negative modulation of angiogenesis by VEGFR1 ligands. Sci Signal. 2009;2(59): re1. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.259re1

8. Iskhakova A.G., Zolotarev A.V., Viktorov D.A., Toropovskii A.N., Nikitin A.G. Rol' faktorov rosta sosudov v razvitii diabeticheskoi retinopatii i makulyarnogo oteka. Rossiiskii oftal'mologicheskii zhurnal. 2018;11(2): 62–69.

9. Ando R, Noda K, Namba S, et al. Aqueous humour levels of placental growth factor in diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92: 245–246. doi: 10.1111/aos.12251

10. Miyamoto N, de Kozak Y, Jeanny J, et al. Placental growth factor-1 and epithelial haemato-retinal barrier breakdown: potential implication in the pathogenesis of diabetic endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and related ligands by VEGF Trap, ranibizumab and bevacizumab retinopathy. Diabetologia. 2007;50: 461–470. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0539-2

11. Papadopoulos N, Martin J, Ruan Q, et al. Binding and neutralization of vascular. Angiogenesis. 2012;15(2): 171–185. doi: 10.1007/s10456-011-9249-6

12. Santoro E.Yu. Opyt primeneniya aflibertsepta v lechenii diabeticheskogo makulyarnogo oteka po standartnomu protokolu v real'noi klinicheskoi praktike. Rossiiskii oftal'mologicheskii zhurnal. 2018;11(4): 80–85.

13. Leal EC, Manivannan A, Hosoya K, Terasaki T, Cunha-Vaz J, Ambrosio AF, Forrester JV. Inducible nitric oxide synthase isoform is a key mediator of leukostasis and blood-retinal barrier breakdown in diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48: 5257–5265.

14. Zhang X, Zeng H, Bao S, Wang N, Gillies MC. Diabetic macular edema: new concepts in pathophysiology and treatment. Cell Biosci. 2014;4: 27. doi: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-27.e

15. Adamis AP, Berman AJ. Immunological mechanisms in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Semin Immunopathol. 2008;30: 65–84. doi: 10.1007/s00281-008-0111-x

16. White NH, Sun W, Cleary PA, Tamborlane WV, Danis RP, Hainsworth DP, Davis MD. Effect of prior intensive therapy in type 1 diabetes on 10- year progression of retinopathy in the DCCT/EDIC: comparison of adults and adolescents. Diabetes. 2010;59:1244–1253. doi: 10.2337/db09-1216

17. Stewart MW. Corticosteroid use for diabetic macular edema: old fad or new trend? Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12: 364–375. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0281-8

18. Sohn HJ, Han DH, Kim IT, Oh IK, Kim KH, Lee DY, Nam DH. Changes in aqueous concentrations of various cytokines after intravitreal triamcinolone versus bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152: 686–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.03.033

19. Schmidt-Erfurth U, Garcia-Arumi J, Bandello F, et al. Guidelines for the management of diabetic macular edema by the european society of retina specialists (EURETINA). Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4): 185–222. doi: 10.1159/000458539

20. Tamura H, Miyamoto K, Kiryu J, et al. Intravitreal injection of corticosteroid attenuates leukostasis and vascular leakage in experimental diabetic retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46: 1440–1444. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0905

21. Chang-Lin JE, Attar M, Acheampong AA, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a sustained-release dexamethasone intravitreal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52: 80–86. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5285

22. Haller JA, Kuppermann BD, Blumenkranz MS, et al. Dexamethasone DDS Phase II Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of an intravitreous dexamethasone drug delivery system in patients with diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:289–296. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.21

23. Kodjikian L. International pharmacological management of diabetic macular edema in real-life observational studies. Biomed Res Int. 2018;8: 8289253. doi: 10.1155/2018/8289253

24. Pacella E, Vestri AR, Muscella R, et al. Preliminary results of an intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7: 1423–1428. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S48364

25. Kamenskikh T.G., Batishcheva Yu.S., Kolbenev I.O. i dr. Opyt antiangiogennoi i kortikosteroidnoi terapii diabeticheskogo makulyarnogo oteka. Saratovskii nauchno-meditsinskii zhurnal. 2017;13(2): 383–388.

26. Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Gonzalez VH, et al. The DA VINCI study: Phase 2 primary results of VEGF Trap-Eye in patients with diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2011;118: 1819–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.018

27. Brown DM, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Do DV, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema: 100-week results from the VISTA and VIVID studies. Ophthalmology. 2015;122: 2044–2052. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.017

28. Korobelnik JF, Do DV, Schmidt-Erfurth U, et al. Intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 2014;121: 2247–2254. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.006

29. Ziemssen F, Schlottman PG, Lim JI, et al. Initiation of intravitreal afliber-cept injection treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema: a review of VIVID DME and VISTA DME data. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2016;2: 16. doi: 10.1186/s40942-016-0041-z

30. Marco A. Zarbin anti-VEGF agents and the risk of arteriothrombotic events. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2018;1: 63–67. doi: 10.22608/APO.2017495

31. Martínez AH, Delgado EP, Silva G, et al. Early versus late switch: How long should we extend the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in unresponsive diabetic macular edema patients? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;5: 1–8. doi: 10.1177/1120672119848257

32. Busch S, Zur D, Fraser‑Bell S, Laíns I, et al. Shall we stay, or shall we switch? Continued anti-VEGF therapy versus early switch to dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular edema. Acta Diabetologica. 2018;55: 789–796. doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1151-x