Валеология: Здоровье, Болезнь, Выздоровление. 2020; : 254-258
ВАЛИДИЗАЦИЯ ОПРОСНИКА MOS SF-36, ОПРЕДЕЛЯЮЩЕГО УРОВЕНЬ КАЧЕСТВА ЖИЗНИ, НА ГЛОБАЛЬНОМ УРОВНЕ
Аннотация
Данный опросник признан во всем мире как один из наиболее широко используемых основных инструментов для оценки качества жизни. На сегодняшний день проведено достаточное количество исследований с использованием опросника SF-36 , где показана валидность данного опросника, что позволило надежно и достоверно определить уровень качества жизни для каждой популяции. В данной работе рассмотрен процесс валидизации опросника SF-36 как инструмента оценки качества жизни в сфере здравоохранения на международном уровне. Таким образом, в этой статье представлен обзор этапов применения опросника SF-36.
Список литературы
1. Apolone G., Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 health survey: translation; validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1025–36.
2. Aaronson N., Muller M., Cohen P. D. A., Essink-Bot M. L., et al. Translation, validation and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease population. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1055–68.
3. Alonso J., Ferrer M., Gandek B., Ware Jr. J. E., Aaronson N. K., Mosconi P. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 283–98.
4. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., Cathain A., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305 (6846): 160–4.
5. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1359-1366.
6. Edward J., Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the international Quality of life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 903–12.
7. Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B., Kosinki M., Aorosaon N. K., Apolone G., Brazier J., et al. The equivalence of Sf-36 Summary health scores estimated using standard and country specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11): 1067–70.
8. Ware J., Gandek B.: Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998, 51: 945-952.
9. Gandek B., Ware J. J.: Methods for validating and norming trans- lations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998, 51: 953-959.
10. Ware J. E., Kosinski M., Dewey J. E. How to score version 2 of the 375 SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 376 2000.
11. Ware Jr. J. E., Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473–83.
12. Ware Jr. J. E., Snow K. K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
13. Keller S. D., Leplege A., Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B., Aorosaon N. K. Testing the equivalence of translation of Widely used response choice labels: results from the IQOLA project. J. Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11): 933–44.
14. Wann-Hansson C., Hallberg I. R., Risberg B. O., Klesvsgard R. A comparison of the Nottingham health profile and Short Form 36 health survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 10: 1477-7525-2-9.
15. Sharples L. D., Todd C. J., Caine N., Tait S. Measurement properties of the Nottingham health Profile and Short Form 36 health status measures in a population sample of elderly people living at home. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5 (17): 217–33.
16. Montazeri A., Goshtasebi A., Vahdaninia M., Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 875–82.
17. Motamed N., Ayatollahi A. R., Zare N., Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A. Validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the SF-36 version 2 questionnaire. East Mediterr Health J 2005; 11 (3): 349–57.
18. Lam C. K., Gandek B., Ren X. S., Chan M. S. Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51 (11): 1139–47.
19. Li L., Wang H. M., Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 health survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 259–63.
20. Anagnostopoulos F., Niakas D., Pappa E. Construct validation of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (5): 1959-1965.
21. Pappa E., Kontodimopoulos N., Niakas D. Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (5): 1433-1438.
22. Sheikh K. A., Yagoub U., Elsatouhy M., Al Sanosi R., Mohamud S. A.: Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in Population of Khat Chewers—Jazan Region-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Applied Research Quality Life. 2013; DOI: 10.1007/s11482-013-9291-1
23. Guermazi M., Allouch C., Yahia M., Huissa T. B., Ghorbel S., Damak J. et al (2012) Translation in Arabic, adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tunisia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 55 (6): 388–403.
24. Mbada C. E., Adeogun G. A., Ogunlana M. O., Adedoyin R. A., Akinsulore A., Awo-tidebe TO et al (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psycho-metric evaluation of Yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13: 141
25. Sullivan M., Ware Jr. J. E. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41 (10) 1995; 11: 1349-1358.
26. Sullivan M., Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of Criterion-Based Validity: Results from Normative Population. J Clin Epidemiol. 51 (11) 1998; 11: 1105-1113.
27. Taft Ch., Karlsson J., Sullivan M. Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version. Qual Life Res 13 (1) 2004; 02: 251-256.
28. Loge J. H., Kvien T. K. Translation and Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. I. Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, Reliability, and Construct Validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 51 (11) 1998; 11: 1069-1076.
29. Lins-Kusterer L., Valdelamar J., Aguiar C., Menezes M., Netto E., Brites C. Validity and reliability of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire version 2 among people living with HIV in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2019; 917: 1-9.
30. Hoffmann Ch., McFarland B. H., Kinzie D., Bresler L., Rakhlin D., Wolf S., Kovas A. E. Psychometric properties of a Russian version of the SF-12 Health Survey in a refugee population. Comprehensive Psych. 2005; 46: 390–397.
Valeology: Health - Illnes - recovery. 2020; : 254-258
VALIDIZATION OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE MOS SF-36 WHICH ESTIMATING LEVEL QUALITY OF LIFE AT THE GLOBAL LEVEL
Abstract
This questionnaire is recognized worldwide as one of the most widely used basic tools for assessing the quality of life. Nowadays, a sufficient number of studies have been carried out using this questionnaire, which shows the validity of this questionnaire, which made it possible to reliably and validly determine the level of quality of life for every population. In this paper we consider how the MOS SF-36 questionnaire at the world level was validated as main assessing the level quality of life in the healthcare sector. Consequently, this article discusses the process and stage of validation of the SF-36 questionnaire.
References
1. Apolone G., Mosconi P. The Italian SF-36 health survey: translation; validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1025–36.
2. Aaronson N., Muller M., Cohen P. D. A., Essink-Bot M. L., et al. Translation, validation and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease population. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 1055–68.
3. Alonso J., Ferrer M., Gandek B., Ware Jr. J. E., Aaronson N. K., Mosconi P. Health-related quality of life associated with chronic conditions in eight countries: results from the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 283–98.
4. Brazier J. E., Harper R., Jones N. M., Cathain A., Usherwood T., Westlake L. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 1992; 305 (6846): 160–4.
5. Bullinger M. German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41: 1359-1366.
6. Edward J., Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B. Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the international Quality of life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 903–12.
7. Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B., Kosinki M., Aorosaon N. K., Apolone G., Brazier J., et al. The equivalence of Sf-36 Summary health scores estimated using standard and country specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA project. International Quality of life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11): 1067–70.
8. Ware J., Gandek B.: Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA Project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998, 51: 945-952.
9. Gandek B., Ware J. J.: Methods for validating and norming trans- lations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1998, 51: 953-959.
10. Ware J. E., Kosinski M., Dewey J. E. How to score version 2 of the 375 SF-36 health survey. Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated; 376 2000.
11. Ware Jr. J. E., Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Med Care. 1992; 30: 473–83.
12. Ware Jr. J. E., Snow K. K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
13. Keller S. D., Leplege A., Ware Jr. J. E., Gandek B., Aorosaon N. K. Testing the equivalence of translation of Widely used response choice labels: results from the IQOLA project. J. Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (11): 933–44.
14. Wann-Hansson C., Hallberg I. R., Risberg B. O., Klesvsgard R. A comparison of the Nottingham health profile and Short Form 36 health survey in patients with chronic lower limb ischemia in a longitudinal perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 10: 1477-7525-2-9.
15. Sharples L. D., Todd C. J., Caine N., Tait S. Measurement properties of the Nottingham health Profile and Short Form 36 health status measures in a population sample of elderly people living at home. Br J Health Psychol 2000; 5 (17): 217–33.
16. Montazeri A., Goshtasebi A., Vahdaninia M., Gandek B. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 875–82.
17. Motamed N., Ayatollahi A. R., Zare N., Sadeghi-Hassanabadi A. Validity and reliability of the Persian translation of the SF-36 version 2 questionnaire. East Mediterr Health J 2005; 11 (3): 349–57.
18. Lam C. K., Gandek B., Ren X. S., Chan M. S. Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese (HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998; 51 (11): 1139–47.
19. Li L., Wang H. M., Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 health survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 259–63.
20. Anagnostopoulos F., Niakas D., Pappa E. Construct validation of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (5): 1959-1965.
21. Pappa E., Kontodimopoulos N., Niakas D. Validating and norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Qual Life Res 2005; 14 (5): 1433-1438.
22. Sheikh K. A., Yagoub U., Elsatouhy M., Al Sanosi R., Mohamud S. A.: Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in Population of Khat Chewers—Jazan Region-Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Applied Research Quality Life. 2013; DOI: 10.1007/s11482-013-9291-1
23. Guermazi M., Allouch C., Yahia M., Huissa T. B., Ghorbel S., Damak J. et al (2012) Translation in Arabic, adaptation and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tunisia. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 55 (6): 388–403.
24. Mbada C. E., Adeogun G. A., Ogunlana M. O., Adedoyin R. A., Akinsulore A., Awo-tidebe TO et al (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psycho-metric evaluation of Yoruba version of the short-form 36 health survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13: 141
25. Sullivan M., Ware Jr. J. E. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41 (10) 1995; 11: 1349-1358.
26. Sullivan M., Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of Criterion-Based Validity: Results from Normative Population. J Clin Epidemiol. 51 (11) 1998; 11: 1105-1113.
27. Taft Ch., Karlsson J., Sullivan M. Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version. Qual Life Res 13 (1) 2004; 02: 251-256.
28. Loge J. H., Kvien T. K. Translation and Performance of the Norwegian SF-36 Health Survey in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. I. Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, Reliability, and Construct Validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 51 (11) 1998; 11: 1069-1076.
29. Lins-Kusterer L., Valdelamar J., Aguiar C., Menezes M., Netto E., Brites C. Validity and reliability of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire version 2 among people living with HIV in Brazil. Braz J Infect Dis 2019; 917: 1-9.
30. Hoffmann Ch., McFarland B. H., Kinzie D., Bresler L., Rakhlin D., Wolf S., Kovas A. E. Psychometric properties of a Russian version of the SF-12 Health Survey in a refugee population. Comprehensive Psych. 2005; 46: 390–397.
