Валеология: Здоровье, Болезнь, Выздоровление. 2020; : 26-32
АКТУАЛЬНОСТЬ ИЗУЧЕНИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ ЧЕЛОВЕЧЕСКИМИ РЕСУРСАМИ В ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯХ ПЕРВИЧНОЙ МЕДИКО-САНИТАРНОЙ ПОМОЩИ
Аннотация
Механизм, используемый для управления распределением ресурсов, является несправедливым, вопрос о том, как выделяются ресурсы лицами, принимающими политические решения в области здравоохранения по всему миру, остается сложной проблемой. Приоритетом сегодня определен процесс выделения ресурсов здравоохранения среди конкурирующих программ или людей. В результате прогнозирования профдефицита врачей были сформулированы различные политические рекомендации.
Список литературы
1. Hsu M., Anen C., Quartz S. R. The right and the good: distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency // Science. 2008. Vol. 320. № 5879. P. 1092–5.
2. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
3. Daniels N. Decisions about access to health care and accountability for reasonableness // J. Urban Heal. 1999. Vol. 76. № 2. P. 176–191.
4. Daniels N. Justice, Health, and Healthcare // Am. J. Bioeth. 2001. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 2–16.
5. DANIELS N., SABIN J. Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers // Philos.
6. Gruskin S., Daniels N. Process Is the Point // Am. J. Public Health. 2008. Vol. 98. № 9. P. 1573–1577.
7. Gruskin S., Daniels N. Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process // Am. J. Public Health. 2008. Vol. 98. № 9. P. 1573–7.
8. Asante A. D., Zwi A. B. Factors influencing resource allocation decisions and equity in the health system of Ghana // Public Health. 2009. Vol. 123. № 5. P. 371–7.
9. Baltussen R., Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis // Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2006. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 14.
10. Youngkong S., Kapiriri L., Baltussen R. Setting priorities for health interventions in developing countries: a review of empirical studies // Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 2009. Vol. 14. № 8. P. 930–939.
11. Lasry A., Carter M. W., Zaric G. S. Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of Kwa Dukuza, South Africa // Health Policy Plan. 2011. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 33–42.
12. DANIELS N., SABIN J. Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers // Philos.
13. Kutzin J., Sparkes S. P. Health systems strengthening, universal health coverage, health security and resilience // Bull. World Health Organ. 2016. Vol. 94. № 1. P. 2–2.
14. Kabene S. M. and etc. The importance of human resources management in health care: a global context // Hum. Resour. Health. 2006. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 20.
15. The World Bank Annual Report 2003. The World Bank, 2003.
16. Zurn P. and etc. Imbalance in the health workforce // Hum. Resour. Health. 2004. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 13.
17. Romanow R. J. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada // eweb: 241963.
18. Ageing and society. Cambridge University Press.
19. Evans R.G. and etc. PRIVATE SECTOR DELIVERY: scope and extent Canadian Institute for Health Information.
20. Zurn P. and etc. Imbalance in the health workforce // Hum. Resour. Health. 2004. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 13.
21. Buerhaus P. I., Staiger D. O., Auerbach D. I. Why are shortages of hospital RNs concentrated in specialty care units? // Nurs. Econ. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 111–6.
22. Buchan J. The “greying” of the United Kingdom nursing workforce: implications for employment policy and practice // J. Adv. Nurs. 1999. Vol. 30. № 4. P. 818–826.
23. Blumetithal D. S. Geographic Imbalances of Physician Supply: An International Comparison // J. Rural Heal. 1994. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 109–118.
24. Hays R. B. and etc. METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN MEDICAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA // Aust. J. Rural Health. 1998. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 32–35.
25. Nigenda G., Machado M. H. From State to market: the Nicaraguan labour market for health personnel // Health Policy Plan. 2000. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 312–318
26. Mercer A. J. and etc. Screening for Service Needs in Primary Health Care Clinics: an Evaluation in Bangladesh // World Health Popul. 2005.
27. Serneels P. and etc. For public service or money: understanding geographical imbalances in the health workforce // Health Policy Plan. 2007. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 128–138.
28. Wibulpolprasert S., Pengpaibon P. Integrated strategies to tackle the inequitable distribution of doctors in Thailand: four decades of experience // Hum. Resour. Health. 2003. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 12.
29. Cooper R. A. Perspectives on the Physician Workforce to the Year 2020 // JAMA. 1995. Vol. 274. № 19. P. 1534.
30. Massachusetts Medical Society. The New England journal of medicine. Massachusetts Medical Society.
31. Shugars D. A.. E. |An. O. Healthy America: Practitioners for 2005. An Agenda for Action for U. S. Health Professional Schools // 1991.
Valeology: Health - Illnes - recovery. 2020; : 26-32
RELEVANCE OF STUDYING HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS
Abstract
The mechanism used to manage resource allocation is unfair, and the question of how resources are allocated by health policy makers around the world remains a complex issue. The priority today is the process of allocating health resources to competing programs or people. As a result of forecasting the professional deficit of doctors, various policy recommendations were
formulated.
References
1. Hsu M., Anen C., Quartz S. R. The right and the good: distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency // Science. 2008. Vol. 320. № 5879. P. 1092–5.
2. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
3. Daniels N. Decisions about access to health care and accountability for reasonableness // J. Urban Heal. 1999. Vol. 76. № 2. P. 176–191.
4. Daniels N. Justice, Health, and Healthcare // Am. J. Bioeth. 2001. Vol. 1. № 2. P. 2–16.
5. DANIELS N., SABIN J. Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers // Philos.
6. Gruskin S., Daniels N. Process Is the Point // Am. J. Public Health. 2008. Vol. 98. № 9. P. 1573–1577.
7. Gruskin S., Daniels N. Process is the point: justice and human rights: priority setting and fair deliberative process // Am. J. Public Health. 2008. Vol. 98. № 9. P. 1573–7.
8. Asante A. D., Zwi A. B. Factors influencing resource allocation decisions and equity in the health system of Ghana // Public Health. 2009. Vol. 123. № 5. P. 371–7.
9. Baltussen R., Niessen L. Priority setting of health interventions: the need for multi-criteria decision analysis // Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2006. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 14.
10. Youngkong S., Kapiriri L., Baltussen R. Setting priorities for health interventions in developing countries: a review of empirical studies // Trop. Med. Int. Heal. 2009. Vol. 14. № 8. P. 930–939.
11. Lasry A., Carter M. W., Zaric G. S. Allocating funds for HIV/AIDS: a descriptive study of Kwa Dukuza, South Africa // Health Policy Plan. 2011. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 33–42.
12. DANIELS N., SABIN J. Limits to Health Care: Fair Procedures, Democratic Deliberation, and the Legitimacy Problem for Insurers // Philos.
13. Kutzin J., Sparkes S. P. Health systems strengthening, universal health coverage, health security and resilience // Bull. World Health Organ. 2016. Vol. 94. № 1. P. 2–2.
14. Kabene S. M. and etc. The importance of human resources management in health care: a global context // Hum. Resour. Health. 2006. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 20.
15. The World Bank Annual Report 2003. The World Bank, 2003.
16. Zurn P. and etc. Imbalance in the health workforce // Hum. Resour. Health. 2004. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 13.
17. Romanow R. J. Building on Values: The Future of Health Care in Canada // eweb: 241963.
18. Ageing and society. Cambridge University Press.
19. Evans R.G. and etc. PRIVATE SECTOR DELIVERY: scope and extent Canadian Institute for Health Information.
20. Zurn P. and etc. Imbalance in the health workforce // Hum. Resour. Health. 2004. Vol. 2. № 1. P. 13.
21. Buerhaus P. I., Staiger D. O., Auerbach D. I. Why are shortages of hospital RNs concentrated in specialty care units? // Nurs. Econ. Vol. 18. № 3. P. 111–6.
22. Buchan J. The “greying” of the United Kingdom nursing workforce: implications for employment policy and practice // J. Adv. Nurs. 1999. Vol. 30. № 4. P. 818–826.
23. Blumetithal D. S. Geographic Imbalances of Physician Supply: An International Comparison // J. Rural Heal. 1994. Vol. 10. № 2. P. 109–118.
24. Hays R. B. and etc. METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES IN MEDICAL WORKFORCE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL AUSTRALIA // Aust. J. Rural Health. 1998. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 32–35.
25. Nigenda G., Machado M. H. From State to market: the Nicaraguan labour market for health personnel // Health Policy Plan. 2000. Vol. 15. № 3. P. 312–318
26. Mercer A. J. and etc. Screening for Service Needs in Primary Health Care Clinics: an Evaluation in Bangladesh // World Health Popul. 2005.
27. Serneels P. and etc. For public service or money: understanding geographical imbalances in the health workforce // Health Policy Plan. 2007. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 128–138.
28. Wibulpolprasert S., Pengpaibon P. Integrated strategies to tackle the inequitable distribution of doctors in Thailand: four decades of experience // Hum. Resour. Health. 2003. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 12.
29. Cooper R. A. Perspectives on the Physician Workforce to the Year 2020 // JAMA. 1995. Vol. 274. № 19. P. 1534.
30. Massachusetts Medical Society. The New England journal of medicine. Massachusetts Medical Society.
31. Shugars D. A.. E. |An. O. Healthy America: Practitioners for 2005. An Agenda for Action for U. S. Health Professional Schools // 1991.
