Валеология: Здоровье, Болезнь, Выздоровление. 2019; : 138-139
НЕСОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТЬ РУБЦА НА МАТКЕ ПОСЛЕ ОПЕРАЦИИ КЕСАРЕВА СЕЧЕНИЯ
Аннотация
В данной статье представлены современные данные по определению, методам диагностики несостоятельности рубца на матке с учетом результатов высокоавторитетных исследований.
Список литературы
1. Betran A. P., Merialdi M., Lauer J. A., Bing-Shun W., Thomas J., Van Look P., Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 : 98–113.
2. Hayakawa H., Itakura A., Mitsui T., Okada M., Suzuki M., Tamakoshi K., Kikkawa F. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 429–434.
3. Wang C. B., Chiu W. W., Lee C. Y., Sun Y. L., Lin Y. H., Tseng C. J. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 : 85–89.
4. MenadaValenzano M., Lijoi D., Mistrangelo E., Costantini S., Ragni N. Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation of the low transverse incision after caesarean section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006; 61 : 216–222.
5. Thurmond A. S., Harvey W. J. , Smith S. A. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 13–16.
6. Osser O. V., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginalsonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35 : 75–83.
7. Naji O., Abdallah Y., Bij De Vaate A. J., Smith A., Pexsters A., Stalder C., McIndoe A., Ghaem-Maghami S., Lees C., Brolmann H. A., Huirne J. A., Timmerman D., Bourne T. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 : 252 – 259.
8. Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J., Jurkovic D. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31 : 72 – 77.
Valeology: Health - Illnes - recovery. 2019; : 138-139
THE INCOMPETENCE OF UTERINE SCAR AFTER CEASAREAN SECTION
Abstract
The article includes a review of international literature on the problem of managing and planning assisted reproductive technology programs in patients with uterine scar. The study of this issue has a high practical significance. The increase in the frequency of operative delivery creates additional difficulties in planning subsequent pregnancies.
References
1. Betran A. P., Merialdi M., Lauer J. A., Bing-Shun W., Thomas J., Van Look P., Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 : 98–113.
2. Hayakawa H., Itakura A., Mitsui T., Okada M., Suzuki M., Tamakoshi K., Kikkawa F. Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 429–434.
3. Wang C. B., Chiu W. W., Lee C. Y., Sun Y. L., Lin Y. H., Tseng C. J. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34 : 85–89.
4. MenadaValenzano M., Lijoi D., Mistrangelo E., Costantini S., Ragni N. Vaginal ultrasonographic and hysterosonographic evaluation of the low transverse incision after caesarean section: correlation with gynaecological symptoms. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2006; 61 : 216–222.
5. Thurmond A. S., Harvey W. J. , Smith S. A. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 13–16.
6. Osser O. V., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. Cesarean section scar defects: agreement between transvaginalsonographic findings with and without saline contrast enhancement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35 : 75–83.
7. Naji O., Abdallah Y., Bij De Vaate A. J., Smith A., Pexsters A., Stalder C., McIndoe A., Ghaem-Maghami S., Lees C., Brolmann H. A., Huirne J. A., Timmerman D., Bourne T. Standardized approach for imaging and measuring Cesarean section scars using ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39 : 252 – 259.
8. Ofili-Yebovi D., Ben-Nagi J., Sawyer E., Yazbek J., Lee C., Gonzalez J., Jurkovic D. Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31 : 72 – 77.
