Азиатско-Тихоокеанский регион: экономика, политика, право. 2021; 23: 111-131
Концепция свободного и открытого Индо-Тихоокеанского региона: общее в многообразии интерпретаций
https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2021-4/111-131Аннотация
В настоящее время Индо-Тихоокеанский регион (ИТР) всё более очевидно превращается в один из популярных концептов, которые используются для характеристики и описания новых трендов в современной мировой политике. Как географический термин он призван очертить границы формирующегося интеграционного пространства. В содержательном плане он представлен многочисленными вариациями «Свободного и Открытого Индо-Тихоокеанского региона (FOIP), отражающими видение региона разными акторами. Эти видения совпадают далеко не во всём и не всегда. В этой связи особую актуальность приобретает вопрос, касающийся наличия общих черт, позволяющих, при всех различиях в национальных интерпретациях, говорить о наличии / формировании согласованного содержательного ядра идеи FOIP. Прежде всего это касается четырёх основных акторов – США, Японии, Австралии и Индии – как инициаторов и наиболее последовательных сторонников концепции Индо-Тихоокеанского региона. Сравнение их подходов уже сегодня позволяет говорить, как минимум, о трёх основных столпах формирующейся единой концепции FOIP, каковыми являются (а) обеспечение мира и стабильности; (б) утверждение и защита фундаментальных ценностей; (в) интенсификация сотрудничества и содействие экономическому развитию. Данное исследование начинается с введения, которое содержит краткое обоснование важности дифференциации ИТР как географического понятия и содержательной концепции. Основная часть исследования посвящена анализу практики текущих региональных взаимодействий ключевых акторов и оценке перспектив формирования общей согласованной стратегии. В заключении отмечается, что несмотря на различия в интерпретациях географических рамок ИТР, есть все основания говорить о начале рождения нового согласованного геополитического его понимания, представленного формулой «Свободного и открытого Индо-Тихоокеанского региона (FOIP)».
Список литературы
1. A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives. December 13, 2007. P. 77–92. – URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg44078/pdf/CHRG110hhrg44078.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
2. A Free and Open Indo-Pacific. Advancing a Shared Vision. U.S. Department of State. November 4, 2019. P. 15. – URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
3. Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018. December 31, 2018. – URL: https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ409/PLAW-115publ409.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
4. Avdaliani, E. Biden’s approach to the Indo-Pacific // BESA Center Perspectives Paper. – 2020. – No. 1, 883, January 13. – URL: https://besacenter.org/biden-indo-pacific-policy/ (дата обращения: 10.08.2021).
5. Bhavan, Jaipragas. Trump strikes a blow in US-China struggle with build act to contain Xi’s Belt and Road // South China Morning Post. – 2018. – 20 October. – URL: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2169441/trump-strikes-blow-us-china-struggle-build-act-contain-xis (дата обращения: 02.07.2021).
6. Brewster, D. A «Free and open Indo-Pacific» and what it means for Australia // The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. – 2018. – 7 March. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/free-and-open-indo-pacific-and-what-it-means-australia (дата обращения: 08.07.2021).
7. Canada and the Indo-Pacific: «Diverse» and «Inclusive», not «Free» and «Open» // Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. – 2020. – September. – Р. 1–126.
8. Conley, T. M. The Indo-Pacific is the New Asia // The Interpreter. – 2019. January 28. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/indo-pacific-new-asia (дата обращения: 14.07.2021).
9. G7 Ise-Shima principles for promoting quality infrastructure investment // MOFA Go. Jp., 2016. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/files/000160272.pdf (дата обращения: 10.06.2021).
10. Khurana, G. S. Proliferation security initiative: an assessment // Strategic Analysis. – April – June 2004. – Vol. 28, no. 2. – P. 237–248.
11. Khurana, G. S. The Indo-Pacific Region. The emerging geopolitical and security environment / G. S. Khurana. – [S. l] : Dictus Publishing, 2018. – 212 р.
12. Khurana, G. S. The «Indo-Pacific» Idea: origins, conceptualisations and the way ahead // Indo-Pacific Report 2019. Indo-Pacific Partnership. Realising the benefits of economic and maritime cooperation. – New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation (NMF), 2019. – Р. 11–28.
13. Heiduk, F. From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific significance, implementation and challenges / F. Heiduk, W. Gudrun // Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik : SWP Research Paper. – [S. l] : German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 9 July 2020. – 43 p.
14. Hemmings, J. A reborn quadrilateral to deter China // The Lowy Interpreter. 2017. – November 9. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/reborn-quadrilateral-deter-china (дата обращения: 07.07.2021).
15. Ho, J. Operationalising the Regional Maritime Security Initiative // IDSS Commentary.18/2004. – 2004. – 27 May. – URL: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CO04018.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
16. India-US Ink Six Agreements, including climate change and terrorism // Indian Express. – 2016. – 8 June. – URL: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/india-us-ink-six-agreements-including-climate-change-and-terrorism-2841485/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
17. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. Preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a net-worked region // The Department of Defense. – 2019. – June 1. – URL: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
18. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. March 2021. – URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
19. Japan’s International Cooperation // White Paper on Development Cooperation 2017. – Tokyo : Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2018. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page22e_000860.html (дата обращения: 10.08.2021).
20. Joint Statement – United States and India: enduring global partners in the 21 Century. The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. June 07, 2016. – URL: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/07/joint-statementunited-states-and-india-enduring-global-partners-21st (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
21. Kai, He. The Institutionalization of the Indo-Pacific: Problems and Prospects / He Kai, Feng Huiyun // International Affairs. – 2020. – 96. 1. – P. 149–168.
22. Kanti, Bajpai. India and Japan: strategic partners for the 21st century // India and Japan: Growing Partnership and Opportunities for Co-operation. – Kochi, Kerala (India) : Centre for Public Policy Research, 2019. – Р. 3–10.
23. McCawley, P. Connecting the Dots on the Blue Dot Net-work // The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. – 2019. – November 12. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/connecting-dots-blue-dot-network (дата обращения: 08.07.2021).
24. The Indo-Pacific: An enlarged perspective / M. Henderson, J. Rogers, A. Hao Yang, J. Huai-Che Chiang. – [S. l.] : The Henry Jackson Society, 2020. – 36 p.
25. Medcalf, R. Indo-Pacific Visions: giving solidarity a chance // Asia Policy. July 2019. – Vol. 14, no 3. – P. 79–95.
26. Pan, Chengxin. The «Indo-Pacific» and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the asian regional order // Australian Journal of International Affairs. – 2014. Vol. 68, no. 4. – Р. 453–469.
27. Pandit, R. India, US and Japan to Kick off Malabar Naval exercise tomorrow // The Times of India. – 2014. – July 23. – URL: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-US-and-Japan-to-kick-off-Malabar-naval-exercise-tomorrow/articleshow/38931444.cms (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
28. Phuwit, Limviphuwat. American investors eye energy sector under Asia edge initiative // The Nation. Thailand. – 2019. – June 21. – URL: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30371530 (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
29. Prashanth, Parameswaran. The Malabar exercise: an emerging platform for Indo-Pacific cooperation? // The Diplomat. – 2016. – June 12. – URL: https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/the-malabar-exercise-an-emerging-platform-for-indo-pacific-cooperation/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
30. Singing of Agreements with Other Countries. Government of India (Ministry of Defence) Press Release. 5 February 2018. – URL: www.pib.nic.in/Pressereleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1519147 (дата обращения: 07.07.2021).
31. Sonoura, Kentaro. Japan’s initiatives for promoting quality infrastructure investment. UN General Assembly High-Level Side Event: Promoting quality infrastructure investment. 19 September, 2017. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000291344.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
32. Strategic Competition Act of 2021. 117th Congress 1st Session. To Address issues involving the People’s Republic of China. – URL: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/DAV21598%20-%20Strategic%20Competition%20Act%20of%202021.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
33. Swaran, Singh. Quads and triangles locating Japan in India’s Act East Policy / Singh Swaran, L. Yamamoto // Global Outlook. A Journal of Global Affairs and Comparative International Development. – Spring 2016. – Vol. 1, no 1. – P. 111–123.
34. Taehwa, Hong. Free and open Indo-Pacific Strategy: accurate diagnosis, imperfect prescription // SNU Journal of International Affairs. – 2018. – Vol. 3, iss. 1. – P. 31–52.
35. Takaaki, Asano. Japan-India relations: toward a special strategic partnership // Japan’s Global Diplomacy. Views from the Next Generation / ed. by Yuki Tatsumi. [S. l.] : Stimson Center, March 2015. – P. 33–41.
36. Tanvi, Madan. The rise, fall, and rebirth of the «Quad» // War on the Rocks. 2017. – November 16. – URL: https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/rise-fall-rebirth-quad/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
37. Aman, T. India and Japan eye the dragon in the room / T. Aman, E. Silverberg // Foreign Policy. – 2019. – 20 November. – URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/20/china-war-navy-india-japan-eye-dragon-in-the-room/ (дата обращения: 02.07.2021).
38. The elements of the China challenge. The Policy Planning Staff, Office of the Secretary of State. November 2020 (Revised December 2020). – URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20-02832-Elements-of-China-Challenge-508.pdf (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
39. The Indo-Pacific: British and Vietnamese perspectives / ed. by J. Rogers, M. Henderson. – [S. l.] : The Henry Jackson Society, October 2020. – Р. 1–40.
40. The proliferation security initiative: can interdiction stop proliferation? // Arms Control Association. June 2004. – URL: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004-06/features/proliferation-security-initiative-interdiction-stop-proliferation (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
41. The 13th IISS Asian Security Summit – The Shangri-La Dialogue-Keynote address by Shinzo ABE Prime Minister, Japan. May 30, 2014 // Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/nsp/page4e_000086.html (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
42. The Trump Administration’s «Free and Open Indo-Pacific»: issues for Congress. CRS Report. October 3, 2018. – URL: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45396 (дата обращения: 14.08.2021).
43. Tomohiro, Osaki. In blow to China, Japan’s «Quality Infrastructure» to get endorsement at Osaka G20 // The Japan Times Online. – 2019. – June 25. – URL: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/06/25/business/economy-business/blow-china-japans-quality-infrastructure-get-endorsement-osaka-g20/ (дата обращения: 12.08.2021).
44. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNCLOS). December 1982. URL: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf (дата обращения: 10.06.2021).
45. US Foreign Policy in a challenging world. Building order on shifting foundations / ed. by M. Clementi, M. Dian, B. Pisciotta. – [S. l] : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. – 406 p.
46. Vijay, Sakhuja. Maritime Power in the 21st Century. Strategic transactions China, India and Southeast Asia / Sakhuja Vijay. – Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011. – 363 p.
47. Wilson, J. Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy // Australian Outlook. Australian Institute of International Affairs. 16 April 2019. – URL: http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/diversifying-australias-indo-pacific-infrastructure-diplomacy/ (дата обращения: 02.07.2021).
48. Wu, Shicun. Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s response / Shicun Wu, Colombage Jayanath. – [S. l.] : Institute for China-America Studies, October 2019. – 21 p.
49. Wu, Zhenglong. Indo-Pacific NATO: a pipe dream // China-US Focus. – 2020. September 16. – URL: https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/indo-pacific-nato-a-pipe-dream (дата обращения: 02.07.2021).
50. Yoshihide, Soeya. Japan’s Indo-Pacific approach: from China Strategy to middle power diplomacy // QS Subject Focus Summit on politics and international relations power shifts in the Asia-Pacific: large and small states perspectives. – Victoria University of Wellington, February 19–21, 2020. – Р. 15. – URL: https://www.academia.edu/43238317/Power_Shifts_in_the_Asia_Pacific_Large_and_Small_States_Perspectives_Conference_Proceedings (дата обращения: 11.06.2021).
Pacific Rim: Economics, Politics, Law. 2021; 23: 111-131
The concept of a free and open Indo-Pacific region: the common ground in a variety of interpretations
https://doi.org/10.24866/1813-3274/2021-4/111-131Abstract
The Indo-Pacific Region (IPR) is increasingly becoming one of the popular concepts used to characterize and describe new trends in modern world politics. As a geographical term, it is intended to outline the boundaries of the emerging integration space. In terms of content, it is represented by numerous variations of the Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) region, reflecting the vision of the region by different actors. These visions do not always coincide in everything. In this regard, the issue of the presence of common features that allows, with all the differences in national interpretations, to speak about the presence / formation of an agreed substantive core of the FOIP idea, becomes relevant. First, this concerns the four main actors – the United States, Japan, Australia, and India – as initiators and most consistent proponents of the Indo-Pacific concept. Comparison of their approaches has already allowed us to speak of at least three main pillars of the emerging single concept of FOIP, which are (a) ensuring peace and stability; (b) asserting and defending fundamental values; and (c) intensifying cooperation and promoting economic development. This study begins with an introduction, which contains a brief substantiation of the importance of differentiating IPR as a geographic concept and a meaningful concept. The main part of the study is devoted to analysing the practice of current regional interactions of key actors and assessing the prospects for the formation of a common coordinated strategy. In conclusion, it is noted that despite the differences in interpretations of the geographic framework of the IPR, there is every reason to talk about emerging of a new coordinated geopolitical understanding of it represented by the formula "Free and Open Indo-Pacific Region (FOIP)".
References
1. A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower. Committee on Armed Services House of Representatives. December 13, 2007. P. 77–92. – URL: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-110hhrg44078/pdf/CHRG110hhrg44078.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
2. A Free and Open Indo-Pacific. Advancing a Shared Vision. U.S. Department of State. November 4, 2019. P. 15. – URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
3. Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018. December 31, 2018. – URL: https://www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ409/PLAW-115publ409.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
4. Avdaliani, E. Biden’s approach to the Indo-Pacific // BESA Center Perspectives Paper. – 2020. – No. 1, 883, January 13. – URL: https://besacenter.org/biden-indo-pacific-policy/ (data obrashcheniya: 10.08.2021).
5. Bhavan, Jaipragas. Trump strikes a blow in US-China struggle with build act to contain Xi’s Belt and Road // South China Morning Post. – 2018. – 20 October. – URL: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/2169441/trump-strikes-blow-us-china-struggle-build-act-contain-xis (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2021).
6. Brewster, D. A «Free and open Indo-Pacific» and what it means for Australia // The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. – 2018. – 7 March. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/free-and-open-indo-pacific-and-what-it-means-australia (data obrashcheniya: 08.07.2021).
7. Canada and the Indo-Pacific: «Diverse» and «Inclusive», not «Free» and «Open» // Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. – 2020. – September. – R. 1–126.
8. Conley, T. M. The Indo-Pacific is the New Asia // The Interpreter. – 2019. January 28. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/indo-pacific-new-asia (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2021).
9. G7 Ise-Shima principles for promoting quality infrastructure investment // MOFA Go. Jp., 2016. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/oda/files/000160272.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2021).
10. Khurana, G. S. Proliferation security initiative: an assessment // Strategic Analysis. – April – June 2004. – Vol. 28, no. 2. – P. 237–248.
11. Khurana, G. S. The Indo-Pacific Region. The emerging geopolitical and security environment / G. S. Khurana. – [S. l] : Dictus Publishing, 2018. – 212 r.
12. Khurana, G. S. The «Indo-Pacific» Idea: origins, conceptualisations and the way ahead // Indo-Pacific Report 2019. Indo-Pacific Partnership. Realising the benefits of economic and maritime cooperation. – New Delhi: National Maritime Foundation (NMF), 2019. – R. 11–28.
13. Heiduk, F. From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific significance, implementation and challenges / F. Heiduk, W. Gudrun // Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik : SWP Research Paper. – [S. l] : German Institute for International and Security Affairs, 9 July 2020. – 43 p.
14. Hemmings, J. A reborn quadrilateral to deter China // The Lowy Interpreter. 2017. – November 9. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/reborn-quadrilateral-deter-china (data obrashcheniya: 07.07.2021).
15. Ho, J. Operationalising the Regional Maritime Security Initiative // IDSS Commentary.18/2004. – 2004. – 27 May. – URL: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/CO04018.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
16. India-US Ink Six Agreements, including climate change and terrorism // Indian Express. – 2016. – 8 June. – URL: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/india-us-ink-six-agreements-including-climate-change-and-terrorism-2841485/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
17. Indo-Pacific Strategy Report. Preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a net-worked region // The Department of Defense. – 2019. – June 1. – URL: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
18. Interim National Security Strategic Guidance. March 2021. – URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/NSC-1v2.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
19. Japan’s International Cooperation // White Paper on Development Cooperation 2017. – Tokyo : Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2018. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/oda/page22e_000860.html (data obrashcheniya: 10.08.2021).
20. Joint Statement – United States and India: enduring global partners in the 21 Century. The White House. Office of the Press Secretary. June 07, 2016. – URL: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/07/joint-statementunited-states-and-india-enduring-global-partners-21st (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
21. Kai, He. The Institutionalization of the Indo-Pacific: Problems and Prospects / He Kai, Feng Huiyun // International Affairs. – 2020. – 96. 1. – P. 149–168.
22. Kanti, Bajpai. India and Japan: strategic partners for the 21st century // India and Japan: Growing Partnership and Opportunities for Co-operation. – Kochi, Kerala (India) : Centre for Public Policy Research, 2019. – R. 3–10.
23. McCawley, P. Connecting the Dots on the Blue Dot Net-work // The Interpreter. Lowy Institute. – 2019. – November 12. – URL: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/connecting-dots-blue-dot-network (data obrashcheniya: 08.07.2021).
24. The Indo-Pacific: An enlarged perspective / M. Henderson, J. Rogers, A. Hao Yang, J. Huai-Che Chiang. – [S. l.] : The Henry Jackson Society, 2020. – 36 p.
25. Medcalf, R. Indo-Pacific Visions: giving solidarity a chance // Asia Policy. July 2019. – Vol. 14, no 3. – P. 79–95.
26. Pan, Chengxin. The «Indo-Pacific» and geopolitical anxieties about China’s rise in the asian regional order // Australian Journal of International Affairs. – 2014. Vol. 68, no. 4. – R. 453–469.
27. Pandit, R. India, US and Japan to Kick off Malabar Naval exercise tomorrow // The Times of India. – 2014. – July 23. – URL: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/India-US-and-Japan-to-kick-off-Malabar-naval-exercise-tomorrow/articleshow/38931444.cms (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
28. Phuwit, Limviphuwat. American investors eye energy sector under Asia edge initiative // The Nation. Thailand. – 2019. – June 21. – URL: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30371530 (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
29. Prashanth, Parameswaran. The Malabar exercise: an emerging platform for Indo-Pacific cooperation? // The Diplomat. – 2016. – June 12. – URL: https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/the-malabar-exercise-an-emerging-platform-for-indo-pacific-cooperation/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
30. Singing of Agreements with Other Countries. Government of India (Ministry of Defence) Press Release. 5 February 2018. – URL: www.pib.nic.in/Pressereleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1519147 (data obrashcheniya: 07.07.2021).
31. Sonoura, Kentaro. Japan’s initiatives for promoting quality infrastructure investment. UN General Assembly High-Level Side Event: Promoting quality infrastructure investment. 19 September, 2017. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000291344.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
32. Strategic Competition Act of 2021. 117th Congress 1st Session. To Address issues involving the People’s Republic of China. – URL: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/DAV21598%20-%20Strategic%20Competition%20Act%20of%202021.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
33. Swaran, Singh. Quads and triangles locating Japan in India’s Act East Policy / Singh Swaran, L. Yamamoto // Global Outlook. A Journal of Global Affairs and Comparative International Development. – Spring 2016. – Vol. 1, no 1. – P. 111–123.
34. Taehwa, Hong. Free and open Indo-Pacific Strategy: accurate diagnosis, imperfect prescription // SNU Journal of International Affairs. – 2018. – Vol. 3, iss. 1. – P. 31–52.
35. Takaaki, Asano. Japan-India relations: toward a special strategic partnership // Japan’s Global Diplomacy. Views from the Next Generation / ed. by Yuki Tatsumi. [S. l.] : Stimson Center, March 2015. – P. 33–41.
36. Tanvi, Madan. The rise, fall, and rebirth of the «Quad» // War on the Rocks. 2017. – November 16. – URL: https://warontherocks.com/2017/11/rise-fall-rebirth-quad/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
37. Aman, T. India and Japan eye the dragon in the room / T. Aman, E. Silverberg // Foreign Policy. – 2019. – 20 November. – URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/20/china-war-navy-india-japan-eye-dragon-in-the-room/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2021).
38. The elements of the China challenge. The Policy Planning Staff, Office of the Secretary of State. November 2020 (Revised December 2020). – URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20-02832-Elements-of-China-Challenge-508.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
39. The Indo-Pacific: British and Vietnamese perspectives / ed. by J. Rogers, M. Henderson. – [S. l.] : The Henry Jackson Society, October 2020. – R. 1–40.
40. The proliferation security initiative: can interdiction stop proliferation? // Arms Control Association. June 2004. – URL: https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2004-06/features/proliferation-security-initiative-interdiction-stop-proliferation (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
41. The 13th IISS Asian Security Summit – The Shangri-La Dialogue-Keynote address by Shinzo ABE Prime Minister, Japan. May 30, 2014 // Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. – URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/nsp/page4e_000086.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
42. The Trump Administration’s «Free and Open Indo-Pacific»: issues for Congress. CRS Report. October 3, 2018. – URL: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45396 (data obrashcheniya: 14.08.2021).
43. Tomohiro, Osaki. In blow to China, Japan’s «Quality Infrastructure» to get endorsement at Osaka G20 // The Japan Times Online. – 2019. – June 25. – URL: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/06/25/business/economy-business/blow-china-japans-quality-infrastructure-get-endorsement-osaka-g20/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.08.2021).
44. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UNCLOS). December 1982. URL: https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 10.06.2021).
45. US Foreign Policy in a challenging world. Building order on shifting foundations / ed. by M. Clementi, M. Dian, B. Pisciotta. – [S. l] : Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. – 406 p.
46. Vijay, Sakhuja. Maritime Power in the 21st Century. Strategic transactions China, India and Southeast Asia / Sakhuja Vijay. – Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011. – 363 p.
47. Wilson, J. Diversifying Australia’s Indo-Pacific infrastructure diplomacy // Australian Outlook. Australian Institute of International Affairs. 16 April 2019. – URL: http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/diversifying-australias-indo-pacific-infrastructure-diplomacy/ (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2021).
48. Wu, Shicun. Indo-Pacific strategy and China’s response / Shicun Wu, Colombage Jayanath. – [S. l.] : Institute for China-America Studies, October 2019. – 21 p.
49. Wu, Zhenglong. Indo-Pacific NATO: a pipe dream // China-US Focus. – 2020. September 16. – URL: https://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/indo-pacific-nato-a-pipe-dream (data obrashcheniya: 02.07.2021).
50. Yoshihide, Soeya. Japan’s Indo-Pacific approach: from China Strategy to middle power diplomacy // QS Subject Focus Summit on politics and international relations power shifts in the Asia-Pacific: large and small states perspectives. – Victoria University of Wellington, February 19–21, 2020. – R. 15. – URL: https://www.academia.edu/43238317/Power_Shifts_in_the_Asia_Pacific_Large_and_Small_States_Perspectives_Conference_Proceedings (data obrashcheniya: 11.06.2021).
