Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2019; 20: 64-68
Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии и правовая проблема выбора пола плода
https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2019-20-2-64-68Аннотация
В работе освещены правовые и этические вопросы, связанные с выбором пола плода в разных странах мира, а также описана динамика общественного мнения по этой проблеме, установленная в результате анкетирования, которое было проведено в 2000 и 2017гг. лабораторией генетики нарушений репродукции ФГБНУ «Медико-генетический научный центр» (г. Москва).
Список литературы
1. Niederberger C., Pellicer A., Cohen J. et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 2018;110(2):185—324. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005.
2. Karabinus D.S., Marazzo D.P., Stern H.J. et al. The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child's sex. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:106. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-106.
3. Ericsson R.J., Langevin C.N., Nishino M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973;246(5433):421—4.
4. Harton G.L., Harper J.C., Coonen E. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD. Hum Reprod 2011;26(1):25—32. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq230.
5. De Wert G., Dondorp W., Shenfield F. et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and Law22: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29(8):1610—7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu132.
6. Pinto L.L., Vieira T.A., Giugliani R., Schwartz I.V Expression of the disease on female carriers of X-linked lysosomal disorders: a brief review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010;5:14. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-14.
7. European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Council of Europe 1997). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98.
8. UNFPA. Sex imbalances at birth: current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok: UNFPA Asian and Pacific Regional Office, United Nations, 2012. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Sex%20Imbalanc-es%20at%20Birth.%20PDF%20UNFPA%20APRO%20publication%202012.pdf.
9. Gu B., Roy K. Sex ratio at birth in China, with reference to other areas in East Asia: what we know. Asia Pac Popul J 1995;10(3):17—42.
10. Mussino E., Miranda V., Ma L. Changes in sex ratio at birth among immigrant groups in Sweden. Genus 2018;74(1):13. DOI: 10.1186/s41118-018-0036-8.
11. Guilmoto C.Z. The masculinization of births. Overview and current knowledge. Population 2015;70(2):183—244.
12. Duthe G., Mesle F., Vallin J. et al. High sex ratios at birth in the Caucasus: modern technology to satisfy old desires. Popul Dev Rev 2012;38(3):487—501.
13. Huang Y., Tang W., Mu Y. et al. The sex ratio at birth for 5,338,853 deliveries in China from 2012 to 2015: a facility-based study. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0167575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167575.
14. Hesketh T., Zhu WX Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(36):13271—5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602203103.
15. Das Gupta M., Jiang L., Xie Z. et al. Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. J Dev Stud 2003;40:153-87.
16. Sen A. Missing women — revisited. BMJ 2003;327(7427):1297-8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1297.
17. Madan K., Breuning M.H. Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview. Genet Med 2014;16(6): 425—32. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.172.
18. Чоговадзе А.Г. Особенности законодательного регулирования преимплантационной и пренатальной генетической диагностики в различных странах. Клеточная трансплантология и тканевая инженерия 2012;7(2):112—7.
19. Pessach N., Glasser S., Soskolne V. et. al. The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005—2011). Isr J Health Policy Res 2014;3(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/2045-4015-3-33.
20. Bayefsky M.J. Comparative preimplantation genetic diagnosis policy in Europe and the USA and its implications for reproductive tourism. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2016;3:41—7. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.001.
21. Федеральный закон «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации» от 21 ноября 2011 г. № 323-ФЗ.
22. Курило Л.Ф. Некоторые морально-этические проблемы репродукции человека. В кн.: Биомедицинская этика. Под ред. В.И. Покровского. М.: Медицина, 1997. С. 151—172.
23. Гришина Е.М., Иванюшкин А.Я., Курило Л.Ф. Морально-этические аспекты определения и выбора пола плода. Медицинское право и этика 2001;(2):40—8.
24. Курило Л.Ф., Боркина ПА, Гришина Е.М. и др. Социологическое исследование, посвященное этико-правовым проблемам биомедицинских технологий. Проблемы репродукции 2001;7(6):22—6.
25. Курило Л.Ф., Боркина ПА, Шилейко Л.В. и др. Общественное мнение об этических и законодательных аспектах некоторых биомедицинских технологий. Медицинское право и этика 2002;(1):49—63.
Andrology and Genital Surgery. 2019; 20: 64-68
Assisted reproductive technologies and legal aspects of sex selection
https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2019-20-2-64-68Abstract
The paper covers the legal and ethical aspects of sex selection, and the dynamics of public opinion on this issue in different countries and regions of the world. Also, the results of two questionnaires, organized by Research Centre for Medical Genetics (2000 and 2017), are analyzed.
References
1. Niederberger C., Pellicer A., Cohen J. et al. Forty years of IVF. Fertil Steril 2018;110(2):185—324. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.005.
2. Karabinus D.S., Marazzo D.P., Stern H.J. et al. The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child's sex. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:106. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-106.
3. Ericsson R.J., Langevin C.N., Nishino M. Isolation of fractions rich in human Y sperm. Nature 1973;246(5433):421—4.
4. Harton G.L., Harper J.C., Coonen E. ESHRE PGD consortium best practice guidelines for fluorescence in situ hybridization-based PGD. Hum Reprod 2011;26(1):25—32. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq230.
5. De Wert G., Dondorp W., Shenfield F. et al. ESHRE task force on ethics and Law22: preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2014;29(8):1610—7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu132.
6. Pinto L.L., Vieira T.A., Giugliani R., Schwartz I.V Expression of the disease on female carriers of X-linked lysosomal disorders: a brief review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2010;5:14. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-5-14.
7. European Convention for the protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Council of Europe 1997). Available at: https://rm.coe.int/168007cf98.
8. UNFPA. Sex imbalances at birth: current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok: UNFPA Asian and Pacific Regional Office, United Nations, 2012. Available at: https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/Sex%20Imbalanc-es%20at%20Birth.%20PDF%20UNFPA%20APRO%20publication%202012.pdf.
9. Gu B., Roy K. Sex ratio at birth in China, with reference to other areas in East Asia: what we know. Asia Pac Popul J 1995;10(3):17—42.
10. Mussino E., Miranda V., Ma L. Changes in sex ratio at birth among immigrant groups in Sweden. Genus 2018;74(1):13. DOI: 10.1186/s41118-018-0036-8.
11. Guilmoto C.Z. The masculinization of births. Overview and current knowledge. Population 2015;70(2):183—244.
12. Duthe G., Mesle F., Vallin J. et al. High sex ratios at birth in the Caucasus: modern technology to satisfy old desires. Popul Dev Rev 2012;38(3):487—501.
13. Huang Y., Tang W., Mu Y. et al. The sex ratio at birth for 5,338,853 deliveries in China from 2012 to 2015: a facility-based study. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0167575. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167575.
14. Hesketh T., Zhu WX Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: causes and consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(36):13271—5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602203103.
15. Das Gupta M., Jiang L., Xie Z. et al. Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. J Dev Stud 2003;40:153-87.
16. Sen A. Missing women — revisited. BMJ 2003;327(7427):1297-8. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1297.
17. Madan K., Breuning M.H. Impact of prenatal technologies on the sex ratio in India: an overview. Genet Med 2014;16(6): 425—32. DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.172.
18. Chogovadze A.G. Osobennosti zakonodatel'nogo regulirovaniya preimplantatsionnoi i prenatal'noi geneticheskoi diagnostiki v razlichnykh stranakh. Kletochnaya transplantologiya i tkanevaya inzheneriya 2012;7(2):112—7.
19. Pessach N., Glasser S., Soskolne V. et. al. The Israeli National Committee for sex selection by pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a novel approach (2005—2011). Isr J Health Policy Res 2014;3(1):33. DOI: 10.1186/2045-4015-3-33.
20. Bayefsky M.J. Comparative preimplantation genetic diagnosis policy in Europe and the USA and its implications for reproductive tourism. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2016;3:41—7. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.001.
21. Federal'nyi zakon «Ob osnovakh okhrany zdorov'ya grazhdan v Rossiiskoi Federatsii» ot 21 noyabrya 2011 g. № 323-FZ.
22. Kurilo L.F. Nekotorye moral'no-eticheskie problemy reproduktsii cheloveka. V kn.: Biomeditsinskaya etika. Pod red. V.I. Pokrovskogo. M.: Meditsina, 1997. S. 151—172.
23. Grishina E.M., Ivanyushkin A.Ya., Kurilo L.F. Moral'no-eticheskie aspekty opredeleniya i vybora pola ploda. Meditsinskoe pravo i etika 2001;(2):40—8.
24. Kurilo L.F., Borkina PA, Grishina E.M. i dr. Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie, posvyashchennoe etiko-pravovym problemam biomeditsinskikh tekhnologii. Problemy reproduktsii 2001;7(6):22—6.
25. Kurilo L.F., Borkina PA, Shileiko L.V. i dr. Obshchestvennoe mnenie ob eticheskikh i zakonodatel'nykh aspektakh nekotorykh biomeditsinskikh tekhnologii. Meditsinskoe pravo i etika 2002;(1):49—63.
